U.S. court to reconsider California ban on high-capacity magazines
Send a link to a friend
[February 26, 2021]
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court said on
Thursday it will reconsider its decision that California's ban on
high-capacity magazines violates the right to bear arms under the U.S.
Constitution's Second Amendment.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals set aside a
decision made last August by a divided three-judge panel, which sided
with opponents of the ban on magazines with more than 10 rounds of
ammunition. An 11-judge panel will now consider the case.
Circuit Judge Kenneth Lee, an appointee of former President Donald
Trump, had written for the majority that the 2017 ban may have been
"well-intentioned" following a spate of "heart-wrenching and highly
publicized mass shootings," but that it infringed the constitutional
right to armed self-defense.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who sought a rehearing, said
the state's law advanced public safety while preserving gun owners'
ability to defend themselves.
Becerra also said the panel's decision conflicted with the five other
federal appeals courts to consider the issue, and well as the 9th
Circuit's own precedent.
President Joe Biden has nominated Becerra to serve as U.S. secretary of
health and human services.
[to top of second column]
|
Illegal high-capacity magazines and an assault rifle along with
multiple guns, ammunition are seen in this Long Beach Police
Department (LBPD) photo in Long Beach, California, U.S., released on
August 21, 2019. Courtesy LBPD/Handout via REUTERS
Lawyers for firearms owners opposed to the ban said the state's
"draconian" ban would strip people of magazines they have owned
without incident for decades.
Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle & Pistol
Association, which also challenged the ban, said it looked forward
to defending the "fundamental" right of people to buy, own and use
standard-capacity magazines in California.
Becerra, in a statement, called the decision to rehear the case "the
next step in the defense of our state's commonsense gun laws."
A lower court judge had stayed the lifting of the ban pending the
state's appeal.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Will Dunham
and Aurora Ellis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |