Explainer: Did Trump break the law by pressuring a Georgia election
official to 'find' votes?
Send a link to a friend
[January 05, 2021]
By Jan Wolfe
(Reuters) - President Donald Trump may have
broken a U.S. federal law and a Georgia law against election tampering
by pressuring the state's top election official to "find" enough votes
to overturn his loss to President-elect Joe Biden in the state,
according to some legal experts.
The experts also outlined a potential legal defense for Trump and
predicted that a prosecution of him arising from Saturday's telephone
call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a fellow
Republican, would be unlikely.
Trump told Raffensperger during the call: "All I want to do is this: I
just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have,"
according to a transcript of the call released by the Washington Post on
Sunday.
The White House declined to comment on the call.
Here is an explanation of the potential legal violations by Trump, based
on interviews with five election and criminal law experts.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2021/Jan/05/images/ads/current/Rolfs_lda_LUAL_2017.png)
Which laws may have been broken?
Georgia has a state law against "criminal solicitation to commit
election fraud." That law makes it illegal for a person to intentionally
solicit, request, command or otherwise attempt to cause another person
to engage in election fraud.
A separate federal law makes it illegal to attempt to "deprive or
defraud" people of a "fair and impartially conducted election process."
The legal experts interviewed by Reuters said Trump may have violated
one or both of these laws.
The phone call was a "flagrant federal criminal violation," said Jessica
Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in California, adding that it
appeared that Trump was using threats to push Raffensperger to alter a
legitimate vote count.
Raffensperger on Monday told ABC's "Good Morning America" program that a
criminal investigation into Trump's actions could be launched in the
state by an Atlanta-area prosecutor, Fulton County District Attorney
Fani Willis.
"Maybe that's the appropriate venue for it to go," Raffensperger said.
In a statement on Monday, Willis said she found Trump's call
"disturbing" and promised to "enforce the law without fear or favor" if
the matter were to be formally referred to her office for investigation.
Raffensperger did not immediately respond to a request for further
comment.
A key question is whether Trump actually requested that Raffensperger
fabricate votes or was just offering his opinion on the results of the
Nov. 3 election, said Georgia State University law professor Anthony
Michael Kreis.
In a possible prosecution, Trump likely would argue he was simply
offering his genuine views on the election and not making a demand,
Kreis said.
Trump told Raffensperger: "We won the election and it's not fair to take
it away from us like this, and it's going to be very costly in many
ways," according to the transcript. "I think you have to say that you're
going to re-examine it."
The president also suggested that Raffensperger could face consequences
if he did not state publicly that there were thousands of shredded
ballots, as the president seized on an unfounded election fraud
allegation.
"That's a criminal offense," Trump said. "And you can't let that
happen."
The legal experts said prosecutors could argue that Trump's power as a
sitting president, combined with the vague threats of prosecution,
amounted to him making an unlawful demand of Raffensperger under the
Georgia statute.
Kreis said a damaging piece of evidence against Trump was his request
that Raffensperger "find" a specific number of votes - just enough to
put him ahead of Biden in Georgia. This indicates Trump was trying to
change the election's outcome and threatening Raffensperger if he did
not help, Kreis added.
"He is exerting his power to browbeat the secretary of state into
finding votes that were not cast," Kreis said.
[to top of second column]
|
![](../images/010521PIX/news_b3.jpg)
President Donald Trump attends a campaign rally for Republican U.S.
senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, ahead of their January
runoff elections to determine control of the U.S. Senate, in
Valdosta, Georgia, U.S., December 5, 2020. REUTERS/Jonathan
Ernst/File Photo
![](../images/ads/current/fitzpatrick_lda_SPONSOR_2017.png)
Biden defeated Trump in crucial election battleground states
including Georgia that the president had won in the 2016 election.
"It is illegal under both federal law and Georgia statutes to
solicit the commission of election fraud, and it is hard to
interpret the president's threatening call demanding that election
officials 'find' votes for him otherwise," said Duke University
School of Law professor Lisa Kern Griffin, a former federal
prosecutor.
"Reaching out in a back-channel call to a secretary of state to
attempt to have vote tallies changed outside of official channels,
especially after courts have rejected post-election challenges,
raises serious questions under federal and state law," added Michael
Morley, a Florida State University professor of election law.
What might Trump's potential defense be?
Criminal laws generally require a guilty state of mind, or a
deliberate intent to carry out a crime. If Trump were prosecuted, he
would likely argue that he genuinely believed the election was
rigged against him, said Justin Levitt, an election law professor at
Loyola Law School.
"The only way in which the president did not commit felonies under
both Georgia and federal law is if he sincerely believes there are
11,780 legitimate Trump votes that have not yet been counted,
despite three different recounts," Levitt said.
This would enable him to argue he was not "willfully and knowingly"
trying to interfere with the election and did not have the intent
that the criminal statute requires, Kreis said.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2021/Jan/05/images/ads/current/stclara_lda_SPONSOR_090519.png)
What are the chances of Trump being prosecuted?
The experts expressed doubt that federal charges would be brought
against Trump, noting that Biden has said that a Trump criminal
trial would not be in the national interest and could further divide
a polarized country. Biden has not addressed Trump's phone call
since it was made public.
Bob Bauer, a senior Biden adviser, said in a statement that the call
captured "the whole, disgraceful story about Donald Trump's assault
on American democracy." The statement did not mention the
possibility of prosecution. Bauer did not respond to a request for
comment on whether Trump should be prosecuted.
Biden is due to take office on Jan. 20, meaning any decision on
federal prosecution would be made by the incoming administration
after Trump leaves office.
Could Trump avoid liability by pardoning himself?
Trump in 2018 said he had "the absolute right" to pardon himself as
part of the presidential executive clemency power. Legal experts
have said it is unclear whether a president can legally issue a
self-pardon. No president has ever tried, so the courts have not
directly weighed in on the question.
Presidential pardons apply only to federal crimes, meaning Trump
would still face potential liability under Georgia law.
The White House declined to comment on the possibility of a
self-pardon.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Additional reporting by Michael Martina;
Editing by Noeleen Walder, Will Dunham and Lincoln Feast)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |