Investor payouts and job cuts jar with U.S. companies'
social pledge
Send a link to a friend
[January 25, 2021] By
Jessica DiNapoli, Ross Kerber and Noel Randewich
(Reuters) - When Randall Stephenson joined
180 of his peers leading many of the richest U.S. companies in signing
the Business Roundtable pledge on the "purpose of a corporation" in
August 2019, the then-chief of AT&T Inc promised to look out for the
interests of all the wireless carrier's stakeholders, not just
shareholders.
Two months later, the Dallas-based company outlined a plan for cost
reductions that also prioritized dividends and stock buybacks for
shareholders, succumbing to pressure from $41 billion hedge fund Elliott
Investment Management LP.
Activist investor Elliott had said its proposals would deliver
"substantial benefits" for shareholders, consumers and employees, but
not everybody came out ahead.
By the end of September 2020, AT&T had eliminated 23,000 positions, or
about 9% of its workforce, many of them during the pandemic. Already one
of the corporate world's top dividend payers with $14.9 billion spent in
2019, AT&T raised its common dividend by 2% and bought back $7.5 billion
of its stock.
"We are the face of AT&T and we go out of our way to help customers
communicate with their families," said Darren Miller, a 35-year-old
technician whose job was cut last July. "But we are a dime a dozen to
them. If they can get someone cheaper to do the job, they will do it."
Miller, who worked in Reseda, California, said he accepted a buyout
offer after managers told him he might be laid off later on less
generous terms, something he said his local union representatives told
him happened to dozens of other employees in the state.
AT&T spokesman Jim Kimberly said most of the workforce reductions "were
from voluntary departure offers and attrition" and declined to comment
on individual cases. He added the company had for years practiced a
"meaningful commitment to all stakeholders" through programs that
include worker retraining and environmental and social justice efforts.
Elliott declined to comment.
Some advocates of a socially-minded stakeholder capitalism say AT&T's
case is representative of the hurdles they face in challenging the
leverage investors have over U.S. companies.
The voluntary governance pledge signed by the CEOs didn't spell out
specific actions, but had the stated aim of moving away from
"shareholder primacy".
https://s3.amazonaws.com/
brt.org/BRT-StatementonthePurposeofa
CorporationOctober2020.pdf
Yet while signatories subsequently reduced payouts to shareholders as
companies put away cash to shield themselves from the financial fallout
of the COVID-19 pandemic, they still give a greater share to investors
than those companies that did not sign the pledge, according to a
Reuters analysis of data compiled by financial information provider
Refinitiv.
The analysis found that the 171 publicly traded companies that signed
the pledge returned a median 60% of net income to shareholders during
the first three quarters of 2020 through dividends and buybacks, versus
a 50% return among the 355 S&P 500 firms that did not sign the
statement.
By comparison, in the first three quarters of 2019, the signatories
returned a median 73% of net income to shareholders versus a 68% return
among the firms that did not sign the pledge, the analysis found.
Tim Gaumer, Refinitiv's director of fundamental research, said pledge
signatories returned more to investors because they had the ability to
do so. "It is easier to pay out dividends and buybacks with confidence
if your income stream is less volatile," he added.
Business Roundtable spokeswoman Jessica Boulanger said the analysis
didn't account for how companies spent money they did not return to
shareholders, nor for "industry differences, company size and longevity
and trends in shareholder returns over time." She added that signatories
had upheld their commitment to work for all stakeholders.
Graphics: Roundtable signatory companies slash buybacks -
https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-CORPORATIONS/STAKEHOLDERS/
qmyvmymqnvr/chart.png
Graphic: Roundtable signatory dividends hold up Roundtable signatory
dividends hold up -
https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-CORPORATIONS/STAKEHOLDERS/
qzjpqmqaxpx/chart.png
'SIGNALING EXERCISE'
The CEOs signed the pledge without legally binding their companies and
largely without approval from their boards. COVID-19 stress-tested their
commitments, as large swathes of the economy were forced to shut down.
The pledge's lack of detail gave signatories wide discretion in deciding
how the pandemic pain would be spread among shareholders, employees and
other stakeholders.
[to top of second column] |
The company logo for AT&T is displayed on a screen on the floor at
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., September 18,
2019. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
"It's a political signaling exercise that doesn't mean very much," said Harvard
Law School professor Jesse Fried, who is on the research advisory council of
Glass, Lewis & Co which advises investors over how to vote on corporate
governance.
Defenders of the Business Roundtable pledge say many contributions to society
cannot be measured as easily as shareholder spending or layoffs. For example, JP
Morgan Chase & Co pledged $30 billion to address racial injustices, and Apple
Inc launched a $100 million diversity drive.
Indeed, some signatories have won praise from progressive-leaning organizations
for standing by employees during the pandemic.
Among them, Target Corp raised its minimum wage to $15 an hour in July from $13,
which was already well above the $7.25 national level.
Some executives and investors argue that unless companies are attractive to
shareholders and keep their stock highly valued, they won't have the money to
invest in their businesses for the benefit of all stakeholders.
"If you don't have access to capital, then you're not going to be around long
enough to face tough societal issues like climate change," said Todd Ahlsten,
chief investment officer for Parnassus Investments, a San Francisco-based firm
with $40 billion under management.
EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION
Less than two years after the signing of the pledge, key protagonists at AT&T
moved on. Stephenson passed the reins to a successor, and Elliott sold what was
once a $3.2 billion stake in the company.
AT&T's layoffs during the pandemic attracted the attention of Democratic
senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, who wrote to the company last July
objecting to "corporations using the pandemic as justification for continuing to
make anti-worker decisions that are aimed at boosting share price."
"The long-term interests of our communities and employees cannot be met without
attracting investor capital," AT&T executive vice president Timothy McKone
responded in a letter.
BlackRock Inc and Vanguard Group Inc, whose CEOs also signed up to the pledge,
were among the AT&T investors who voted down a proposal last April to have an
employee representative on the company's board - a step its advocates argued
would give stakeholders a voice. Both fund managers declined to comment.
SPENDING ON SHAREHOLDERS
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania researchers found that among
signatories, the bigger share of profits companies subsequently returned to
investors, the more likely they were to announce layoffs and furloughs.
A study from the London School of Economics and Columbia University found
signatories violated environmental and labor-related rules and paid their CEOs
more than similarly-sized peers.
Like AT&T, some companies that signed up continued payouts to shareholders even
as they cut jobs during the pandemic.
Cisco Systems Inc bought back $800 million of its shares during the three months
ended Oct. 24, 2020. The network equipment maker had announced a restructuring
plan in August to cut $1 billion in costs annually, with the loss of about 3,500
jobs.
"Cisco believes in the Business Roundtable pledge balancing the needs of all of
our stakeholders and fulfilling our own company's purpose of powering a more
inclusive future for all," the company said in a statement.
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc repurchased $522 million of its shares from April
through July. That month, the pharmacy operator cut 4,000 jobs, some 7% of its
headcount, bumped up its dividend and nixed its stock buyback program.
Walgreens did not respond to a request for comment.
The chairman of the Business Roundtable, Walmart Inc CEO Doug McMillon,
downplayed the significance of the pledge in remarks to investors last February.
He said "it didn't feel like news" because companies sought to balance the
interests of all stakeholders anyway, and that "of course, our shareholders are
our priority."
Walmart declined to make McMillon available for an interview. A company
spokeswoman pointed to McMillon's previous comments on multi-stakeholder
capitalism being "the answer to addressing our challenges holistically."
(Reporting by Jessica DiNapoli in New York, Ross Kerber in Boston and Noel
Randewich in San Francisco; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Pravin Char)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |