Column: China fails to learn from Trump backfire in trade war, is losing
against Australia
Send a link to a friend
[January 27, 2021] By
Clyde Russell
LAUNCESTON, Australia (Reuters) - China is
paying a heavy toll for its efforts to punish Australia by banning or
restricting certain commodity imports, while conversely Australia seems
to have avoided any serious financial ramifications so far.
It is perhaps surprising that the authorities in Beijing, having
witnessed how the trade war launched by former U.S. President Donald
Trump backfired on his own country, would be keen to try the same thing
on Australia.
Trump tweeted in March 2018, as his administration was ramping up its
tariffs against Chinese goods that "trade wars are good, and easy to
win".
It turns out that he was somewhat right, but only in the reverse of what
he expected, insofar as the country that launches the trade war tends to
be the loser, and the country that is the intended target seems to
prosper.
Coal is the highest-profile Chinese target in the Australia row. Beijing
effectively all but banned imports from Australia as part of its efforts
to pressure Canberra on several issues, ranging from Australia's call
for an international investigation into the origins of the coronavirus
pandemic to the decision to block Huawei from Australia's 5G network
rollout.
China's imports of Australian coal have collapsed, with Refinitiv
vessel-tracking and port data showing just 687,000 tonnes were
discharged in December, down from the 2020 peak of 9.46 million tonnes
in June.
But the data also show that Australia's overall exports haven't really
suffered, with December shipments of 33.82 million tonnes being the best
month in 2020.
While the cold snap across north Asia boosted demand from Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan, it also appears Australia has managed to ship more
coal to other regional consumers, such as India, Vietnam and Thailand.
Coal is more than just a volume story, with prices moving in favour of
Australia and against China.
Australia's coal exports were worth A$3.7 billion ($2.87 billion) in
December, the most since May last year, according to data from the
Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The benchmark Australian thermal coal price, the Newcastle Weekly Index,
as assessed by commodity price reporting agency Argus, ended at $87.52 a
tonne on Jan. 22. That was up 89% from its 2020 low of $46.37, reached
in September, at a time when market concern over the impact of China's
effective ban on imports was highest.
The rise in seaborne coal prices has made it more expensive for China to
buy imported coal. In turn, that has allowed domestic prices to remain
elevated as they aren't facing competition from overseas producers.
The price of thermal coal at Qinhuangdao has retreated in recent days,
ending at 873 yuan ($135.14) a tonne on Jan. 26, down from the recent
high of 1,038 yuan.
[to top of second column] |
An Aurizon coal train travels through the countryside in
Muswellbrook, north of Sydney, Australia, April 9, 2017.
REUTERS/Jason Reed
But even with the recent drop, the Chinese benchmark is still some 87%
higher than the 2020 low of 467 yuan a tonne from May - well above the
520-570 yuan range believed to be preferred by the authorities as it
ensures mines remain profitable but fuel costs for utilities aren't too
high.
IRON ORE, COPPER
It's not just coal where Australia seems to be more than holding its own
in the trade dispute: exports of cereals rose to A$1.19 billion in
December, the highest on record and almost three times the value of
shipments in November.
China imposed an 80.5% tariff on imports of Australian barley in May
last, collapsing the trade between the two nations. But while Australian
barley farmers were initially hit hard, they have successfully managed
to switch to alternative markets or plant other crops.
China also has an unofficial ban on imports of copper ores and
concentrates from Australia, which had been its fifth biggest supplier.
However, a global shortage of mined copper ores means China is being
forced to pay more for supplies. At the same time its smelters are
having to pay less for treatment and refining charges, as they struggle
to source material.
Again, what has happened is that China has cut itself off from a source
of supply at a time of global shortage. It has imposed costs on itself
and no penalty on Australian copper miners, who can sell easily to other
buyers.
China hasn't mandated any restrictions on the most important commodity
it buys from Australia, namely iron ore. But it is having to pay
handsomely for buying the steel-making ingredient given supply issues in
Brazil, the second-largest exporter behind Australia.
Australia's exports of metal ores, which include iron ore and copper,
rose to a record A$15.2 billion in December, up 22.6% on November,
according to official statistics.
Overall, Australia's exports to China were A$13.34 billion in December,
the highest since June, reflecting strong demand for iron ore, liquefied
natural gas and some agricultural commodities.
Since China started its trade actions against Australia, the numbers
seem to be tilting heavily in favour of Canberra.
This supports the lesson from the U.S.-China trade dispute: if you still
need the products you are targeting for tariffs or import bans, it will
cost more to source them from other suppliers.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for
Reuters.)
(Editing by Kenneth Maxwell)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |