Analysis: A tulip by another name? 'Gamestonk' and the case for investor
caution
Send a link to a friend
[January 30, 2021]
By David Randall
NEW YORK (Reuters) - It sounds like the
start of a parable: Investors stuck inside during a pandemic begin to
bid up an asset until its price becomes untethered to reality. The value
soars until one day the market runs out of buyers and freezes, causing
prices to plummet and some unlucky few to lose fortunes more than ten
times their annual incomes in the span of a few hours.
The date: February 3, 1636. On that day, the infamous Dutch tulip bubble
burst during an outbreak of the bubonic plague, illustrating that asset
prices can plummet just as quickly as they soar, leaving only pain
behind.
Now, almost exactly 385 years and another pandemic later, Wall Street
waits to see how long it will take for history to repeat itself.
Shares of video game retailer GameStop Corp have soared 1,625% since the
start of January. Driving the rally are individual investors who have
been stuck at home for the last ten months. Many have turned to online
forums like WallStreetBets on Reddit and are buying the stock, some as a
form of protest against hedge fund managers who wagered that it would
fall.
These amateur investors are buoyed by savings built up over the
coronavirus pandemic, two rounds of stimulus payments and near zero
interest rates. Some, such as billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, have
referred to the phenomenon as 'Gamestonk', a play on the intentional
misspelling of the word 'stock' on social media.
The stock price rally to above $300 per share has emboldened some small
investors to pour even more money into a company that Wall Street
analysts tracked by Refinitiv believe is worth slightly more than $13
per share. The surge increases the risk that individuals will get caught
up in the euphoria and look past the warning signs and consequences of
an eventual crash.
"I dumped my savings into GME, paid my rent for this month with my
credit card, and dumped my rent money into more GME (which for the
people here at WSB, I would not recommend)," a Reddit user with the
handle ssauron wrote Thursday on WallStreetBets. "And I'm holding. This
is personal for me, and millions of others."
A form of class warfare waged through the shares of a video game
retailer is notably different than financial market manias, such as the
dotcom bubble in 2000 or the U.S. real estate bubble that culminated in
the 2008 financial crisis, both which were fueled by assumptions of
broad economic growth.
Yet for those who buy GameStop at the wrong time, the results will
likely be the same.
"The reality is that GameStop doesn't hurt Wall Street. It might hurt a
couple of hedge fund managers out there, but no one is going to cry for
them. The people who will be losing their life savings are small retail
investors," said Ben Inker, head of asset allocation at GMO.
The total value of short positions in Reddit-favored stocks such as
GameStop is about $40 billion, limiting the pain among professional
investors to a handful of hedge funds, according to Barclays.
Overall, GameStop shorts were down about $5 billion for the year through
Tuesday, according to S3 Partners. By comparison, Tesla Inc, another
heavily-shorted stock among professional investors, caused short sellers
$245 billion in losses in 2020, the firm noted.
"While we expect some more deleveraging, ultimately the scale of the
problem appears quite limited," Barclays said.
The likelihood that most of the losses from the rally in GameStop will
come among the same group of retail investors who prodded it higher is
leaving many on Wall Street baffled as the bubble continues to grow.
GameStop surged 67.9% higher Friday to close at $325 per share.
"GameStop is not worth $500, not worth $400, not worth $300, not worth
$200, not even worth $100, not even worth $50," billionaire investor
Leon Cooperman said on CNBC Thursday. "I'm not damning them. I'm just
saying from my experience, this will end in tears," he added.
BURSTING BUBBLES
The dotcom bubble peaked in March 2000 and over the next two years the
tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index slid nearly 77% as companies that were
touted as can't miss investments ran out of financing. By the time the
Nasdaq bottomed in October 2002, some $6.2 trillion in household wealth
had been destroyed, according to Amir Sufi, a professor at the
University of Chicago.
[to top of second column]
|
A GameStop store is pictured amid the coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) pandemic in the Manhattan borough of New York
City, New York, U.S., January 27, 2021. REUTERS/Carlo
Allegri
The 2008 financial crisis, meanwhile, wiped away approximately $16.4
trillion from American households through a combination of steep
stock market losses and plummeting home equity, according to the
Federal Reserve.
No one expects that the GameStop bubble will cause anything close to
the same levels of economic pain as the financial crisis or dotcom
bust before it, in part because the company has a low share count
and was not widely held by institutional or retail investors prior
to the start of the year. With $6.5 billion in revenues in its last
fiscal year and fewer than 53,000 employees worldwide, it does not
have an outsized economic impact.
Yet a fall will be concentrated on those who helped upend Wall
Street's notion of what retail investors can do.
"There's going to be some blood on the floor when this is all over,
but that's going to be some hedge fund blood and a lot of retail
blood," said Donald Langevoort, a professor at Georgetown Law who
studies retail investors and securities regulation.
Melvin Capital and Citron Research, two prominent GameStop
short-sellers, said earlier this week that they had already closed
out their positions.
Securities laws that typically protect smaller investors from fraud
may be of little help for investors who buy shares of GameStop at
elevated levels, Langevoort said.
"I don't know if there is an organization or orchestrator that is
using deceit and trickery, especially when the motivation seems to
be 'Let's support GameStop and show them,'" he said. "The SEC has to
take a deep breath and ask itself whether it has a strong enough
case to put a stop to this."
'LIFE OF ITS OWN'
The outsized rally in GameStop is happening at a time when
valuations across financial markets appear to be stretched. The S&P
500 index trades at a forward price to earnings ratio of 23.1, near
its peak during the dotcom bubble, while the cryptocurrency bitcoin
jumped 14% Friday after gaining 265% over the past 12 months.
The rise of commission-free trading platforms such as Robinhood have
helped inflate asset market bubbles by lowering the bar for retail
investors to trade, said Ronnie Sadka, a finance professor at Boston
College.
"Retail investors are becoming a systemic risk," that the SEC is
ill-prepared to handle, he said. "The challenge with regulation is
that this is not a case where Wall Street is squeezing the mom and
pops, this is a case where the short-sellers are getting squeezed."
The surging value of GameStop shares is luring investors who will
most likely be burned in the end, said Michael Pachter, an analyst
at Wedbush Securities who has a $16 price target for the company.
"This is the tulip bubble all over again,” he said, adding that he
received a call from a friend who bragged that he put $1,000 into
Reddit favorites such as GameStop, AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc
and BlackBerry Ltd and was now up $400,000 in two weeks. "He doesn't
even know what GameStop sells," Pachter said.
How will the GameStop mania end? If it is like the original tulip
bubble, it could lead to a "short-term crisis of trust" in financial
markets, said Anne Goldgar, a professor at the University of
Southern California.
Every jump in the price of GameStop, meanwhile, brings in more
short-sellers enticed by ever-growing potential gains and more
buyers looking to stick a thumb in the eye of Wall Street, causing
the cycle to continue, Pachter said.
"This thing has a life of its own," Pachter said.
(Reporting by David Randall; editing by Paritosh Bansal and Edward
Tobin)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |