Ghislaine Maxwell says Bill Cosby's freedom justifies dropping sex
trafficking charges
Send a link to a friend
[July 03, 2021]
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Lawyers for Ghislaine
Maxwell said the overturning of Bill Cosby's 2018 sexual assault
conviction justifies throwing out sex trafficking and other charges
stemming from her relationship with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Cosby, 83, was released from prison on Wednesday after Pennsylvania's
Supreme Court said a prosecutor's 2005 agreement not to charge him with
drugging and assaulting Temple University employee Andrea Constand meant
the actor and comedian should not have been charged a decade later.
In a Friday letter to U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan,
Maxwell's lawyers said the British socialite's case was similar to
Cosby's because she had been immunized under Epstein's 2007
nonprosecution agreement.
They said this supported dismissing four charges from Maxwell's
eight-count indictment, which covers alleged crimes from 1994 and 2004
and could subject her to 80 years in prison. Maxwell, 59, has pleaded
not guilty.
"As in Cosby, the government is trying to renege on its agreement and
prosecute Ms. Maxwell over 25 years later for the exact same offenses
for which she was granted immunity," Maxwell's lawyers said. "This is
not consistent with principles of fundamental fairness."
The office of U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss in Manhattan declined to
comment.
Epstein struck his agreement with federal prosecutors in Florida in
exchange for pleading guilty to state prostitution charges.
Nathan ruled in April that the agreement did not bind prosecutors in
Manhattan. She also rejected Maxwell's claim that it covered accused
co-conspirators like herself.
[to top of second column]
|
Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell said the overturning of Bill Cosby's
2018 sexual assault conviction justifies throwing out sex
trafficking and other charges stemming from her relationship with
the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. This report produced by Freddie
Joyner.
The 2005 decision not to charge Cosby cleared the way
for his testimony in a civil lawsuit by Constand, which ended in a
$3.36 million settlement.
Pennsylvania prosecutors later used incriminating testimony Cosby
gave to build a new criminal case. The Pennsylvania court said they
could not, and set Cosby free after he had served more than two
years of a possible 10-year sentence.
On Wednesday, one of Maxwell's lawyers, David Markus, argued in an
opinion piece in New York's Daily News that Cosby's release
justified ending Maxwell's prosecution.
He said it was unfair for prosecutors to use Maxwell's testimony in
2016 from a civil lawsuit against her by Epstein accuser Virginia
Giuffre to build their case, and that a jury should reject their
"flimsy and stale charges."
On Thursday, prosecutors said Markus' opinion violated a court rule
against lawyers making "extrajudicial statements" that could taint
the jury pool, and asked Nathan to order him to comply.
Lawyers for Maxwell have also accused prosecutors of using unfair
tactics to sway potential jurors.
Maxwell's trial could begin in November.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|