An influential panel of medical experts also voted unanimously that
there is no evidence that the drug, Aduhelm, provides a net health
benefit to patients.
The 15-0 vote, at a meeting convened by the Institute of Clinical
and Economic Review (ICER), followed confirmation from the Cleveland
Clinic, one of the country’s best-known health systems, and New
York's Mount Sinai Health System that they had decided not to carry
Aduhelm.
"The tide turned on Friday when the inspector general investigation
was announced," Dr. Sam Gandy, director of the Mount Sinai Center
for Cognitive Health, told Reuters.
The Food and Drug Administration called last week for an independent
federal probe into its representatives’ interactions with Biogen.
Biogen shares fell nearly 7% on Thursday, closing at $328.16.
Guggenheim analyst Yatin Suneja attributed the drop to the decision
by the two hospital systems not to use the drug.
In mid-June, the Washington, D.C., Neurology Center said it would
not recommend the treatment, which is given as a monthly infusion,
for any of its patients due to concerns about efficacy, safety and
cost.
The FDA approved the drug, also known as aducanumab, in early June
despite mixed clinical trial results, citing convincing evidence
that Aduhelm can clear amyloid brain plaques and benefit Alzheimer's
patients.
But others have raised questions about whether there is evidence
that it slows cognitive decline and assailed its high cost.
Biogen, which priced Aduhelm at $56,000 a year, said in a statement
on Thursday that clinical data supported the drug's approval and
patients who are denied access should contact the company for help.
ICER has already said the drug is cost effective at no more than
$8,400 per year. The group's review is closely watched by insurers
negotiating prices with drugmakers, although its role is not clear
in the case of Aduhelm, which is expected to mostly be paid for by
Medicare.
Chris Leibman, Biogen senior vice president of value and access,
said a key factor in Biogen's pricing was that it expects only a
"fraction" of the 1-2 million patients eligible for the drug to
eventually be treated with it.
[to top of second column] |
"We do not believe that there
is going to be a large number of patients," he
said.
INSURERS ON HOLD
Insurers representing millions of American
enrolled in private Medicare plans said the drug
has yet to meet their bar for coverage based on
the data.
UnitedHealth Group, the largest private insurer
offering Medicare Advantage coverage to seniors,
on Thursday said it was still reviewing the drug
and awaiting input from Medicare.
"This has some way to go before we get to real
clarity. So I wouldn't guide you to expect a
very rapid decision-making on this piece," CEO
Andrew Witty said.
Humana, the second largest provider of Medicare
Advantage plans, also said it has not finalized
coverage for Aduhelm as it awaits guidance from
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS).
Several Blue Cross Blue Shield health insurance
plans, including those in Michigan, North
Carolina and Pennsylvania, have said there is
insufficient evidence of Aduhelm's benefit for
patients and they will not provide coverage for
the drug.
Biogen said in a statement that the several
Blues plans' "characterization of Aduhelm as
experimental and investigational is inaccurate
and misleading."
CMS on Monday began a national review process it
said would take nine months to complete. Until
then, the agency said coverage determinations
for aducanumab are being made at the local level
by 12 regional contractors.
Mark McClellan, director of the Duke-Margolis
Center for Health Policy and a former FDA
Commissioner and CMS Administrator said during
the ICER review that access to Aduhelm will be
"pretty limited" at least until CMS finalizes
its national coverage terms.
SVB Leerink this week said a survey of 57 U.S.
neurologists who treat high volumes of
Alzheimer’s patients found that 44% of them
would use Aduhelm in patients with early
Alzheimer's disease who have evidence of amyloid
plaques.
The Wall Street firm estimates sales of the drug
at $65 million this year, $1.1 billion next year
and $5 billion by 2025.
(Reporting by Deena Beasley; Additional
reporting by Manas Mishra in Bangalaru and Julie
Steenhuysen in Chicago; Editing by Howard Goller,
Daniel Wallis and Ana Nicolaci da Costa)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content |