Mississippi asks U.S. Supreme Court to overturn abortion rights landmark
Send a link to a friend
[July 23, 2021]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The state of
Mississippi on Thursday urged the U.S. Supreme Court in a major case set
to be argued in its next term to overturn the landmark 1973 ruling that
recognized that women have a constitutional right to obtain an abortion.
Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch, a Republican, said in papers
filed with the court that the Roe v. Wade ruling and a subsequent 1992
decision that affirmed it were both "egregiously wrong" and that state
legislatures should have more leeway to restrict abortion. The court has
a 6-3 conservative majority.
The filing marked the first time that Mississippi, in seeking to revive
a restrictive state abortion law blocked by lower courts, made
overturning Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide and ended
an era in which some states had banned the procedure, a central part of
its argument.
"It is time for the court to set this right and return this political
debate to the political branches of government," Fitch added in a
statement.
Mississippi is one of numerous Republican-governed states in recent
years to have passed ever-more-restrictive abortion laws.
The court in May agreed to take up the Mississippi case and will
hear it in its term that begins in October. The justices are likely to
hear oral arguments in November, with a ruling due by the end of June
2022.
"If Roe falls, half the states in the country are poised to ban abortion
entirely. Women of child-bearing age in the U.S. have never known a
world in which they don't have this basic right, and we will keep
fighting to make sure they never will," said Nancy Northup, president of
the Center for Reproductive Rights, which is among those challenging
Mississippi's law.
Mississippi's Republican-backed 2018 law bans abortion after 15 weeks of
pregnancy. Lower courts ruled against the law, which legislators enacted
with full knowledge that it was a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade.
[to top of second column]
|
A view shows the pediment of the U.S. Supreme Court building in
Washington, D.C., U.S. June 25, 2021. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo
It has been a longstanding aim of religious conservatives to overturn
Roe v. Wade, which recognized that a constitutional right to personal
privacy protects a woman's ability to obtain an abortion. The court in
its 1992 decision, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v.
Casey, reaffirmed the ruling and prohibited laws that place an "undue
burden" on a woman's ability to obtain an abortion.
Roe v. Wade said that states could not ban abortion
before the viability of the fetus outside the womb, which is
generally viewed by doctors as between 24 and 28 weeks. The
Mississippi law would ban abortion much earlier than that. Other
states have backed laws that would ban the procedure even earlier.
Abortion opponents are hopeful the Supreme Court will narrow or
overturn Roe v. Wade. The court's conservative majority includes the
addition last year of Republican former President Donald Trump's
third appointee, Justice Amy Coney Barrett. She replaced liberal
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an abortion rights champion who died in
September.
After the only abortion clinic in Mississippi, Jackson Women's
Health Organization, sued to block the 15-week ban, a federal judge
in 2018 ruled against the state. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals in 2019 reached the same conclusion.
The Supreme Court in a 5-4 June 2020 ruling struck down a Louisiana
law that imposed restrictions on doctors who perform abortions.
Ginsburg was still on the court at the time and conservative Chief
Justice John Roberts voted with the court's liberal wing in the
ruling. Roberts, however, made it clear that he voted that way
because he felt bound by the court's 2016 ruling striking down a
similar Texas law.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |