Analysis - Law without order: investors grapple with China's regulatory
risk
Send a link to a friend
[July 26, 2021] By
Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Lewis Krauskopf
(Reuters) - Western investors are wrestling
with the risks of investing in U.S. listed stocks of Chinese companies
after Beijing embarked on a regulatory crackdown on large swathes of its
economy, from the internet sector to private tutoring.
The S&P/BNY Mellon China Select ADR Index, which tracks the American
depositary receipts (ADRs) of major U.S.-listed Chinese companies,
dropped 5.9% on Friday after Beijing moved to bar tutoring for profit in
core school subjects, triggering a collapse in the shares in the sector.
It was the latest in a series of actions by Beijing that have caused the
index to lose 18.8% since the beginning of the year. A string of
cybersecurity investigations by Chinese regulators into major technology
companies such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd and Baidu Inc has prompted
many investors to dump their shares.
China's latest crackdown on technology firms was announced just two days
after ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc went public in New York at the
end of last month. Its shares are down 42% since the initial public
offering.
The Chinese Communist Party's uneasy relationship with private business
has always weighed on the minds of Western investors who seek legal and
regulatory certainty to place their bets.
Yet Beijing's recent moves are unsettling even seasoned investors who
are otherwise used to navigating corporate China's murky auditing and
poor governance in order to chase growth in the world's second-largest
economy.
Max Gokhman, head of asset allocation at Pacific Life Fund Advisors,
where he oversees more than $30 billion in assets, said he believed
Beijing's end game was to bring capital back to China. He said he was
bullish on many Chinese consumer-facing companies over the long term
because of the country's emerging middle class, but that it was
difficult to price stocks in the short term.
"The near-term picture is murky as Chinese ADR issuers are caught in the
crossfire between U.S. regulators that are asking for more disclosures
and Chinese regulators that demand privacy for data on Chinese
citizens," Gokhman said.
[to top of second column] |
The app logo of Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi is seen through a
magnifying glass on a computer screen showing binary digits in this
illustration picture taken July 7, 2021. REUTERS/Florence
Lo/Illustration
Some investors deem these investments too risky. Paul Nolte, portfolio manager
at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago, said he has not held any
China-related stocks in his portfolio for the last two years because of the
political risk.
"What we have done is moved away from the fundamentals of the companies. It has
now become a political football and there is no way to analyze that and put it
into a financial spreadsheet," Nolte said.
The vexing question for many investors is whether they can call the bottom in
these stocks. With the S&P 500 at record levels after rallying more than 95%
from its March 2020 lows, they are trying to establish whether the next rally
could come in Chinese ADRs.
The discrepancy in the trajectory of the shares of U.S. and Chinese companies
has been especially profound in the technology sector. The regulatory clamp-down
has suppressed the value of Chinese tech firms just as U.S. technology giants
are riding high after work-from-home and big data trends accelerated during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
"At this point, it is anyone's guess where (Chinese ADRs) will bottom, and where
you are seeing this money go is to the U.S. big tech stocks," said Joel Kulina,
a senior trader at Wedbush Securities who specializes in technology stocks.
(Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston and Lewis Krauskopf in New York;
Additional reporting by Noel Randewich in San Francisco and Echo Wang in New
York; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Sam Holmes)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |