Op-Ed:
Limited government can make a comeback in pandemic era
[The Center Square]
Nathan Benefield | RealClearWire
This year’s federal
deficit is set to match the entire 1996 federal budget, adjusted for
inflation. Despite such overwhelming spending, Democrats in Congress
have proposed an unprecedented $3.5 trillion budget, in addition to the
$1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that failed its first Senate vote last
week. |
For advocates of limited government, it’s easy to feel like the
fight is over and the country is on the path to fiscal ruin. But such pessimism
is unwarranted.
The profligate political culture that has infected Washington and many state
governments isn’t an historical end point. Though voters tend to enjoy handouts,
at least temporarily, they dislike the long-term economic consequences of
excessive spending. Moreover, the imperious actions of governors amid the
COVID-19 crisis have weakened voters’ support for unrestricted executive powers
and the government’s education monopoly.
In response, policymakers, including in Pennsylvania, are
moving against big government in the pandemic era.
Consider the present economic climate. As prices – including for housing, food,
and fuel – precipitously increase, business owners and consumers alike are
worried about inflation. President Joe Biden has responded by embarking on a
futile attempt to distract from the obvious source of the problem: government
spending and easy money.
At the same time, a recent New York Times poll shows that 52% to 71% of
Americans support ending the $300-per-week extra unemployment pay from
Washington. Even today, months after communities fully reopened, too many
Americans remain out of work while the federal government continues to subsidize
unemployment. But Americans instinctively dislike anti-work policies. Now, state
governments are reinstating work-search requirements; 26 states have even
rejected federal unemployment supplements.
Meanwhile, as families endured a year of locked classrooms – especially in
public school districts – there is a renewed interest in educational choice. As
it stands, more than a dozen states have either created or expanded
education-choice programs following the pandemic, with more states poised to act
soon.
Even in my home state of Pennsylvania, where Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf is a
teachers’ union favorite, legislation that increases tax-credit scholarships for
thousands of low-income students is now law.
The fact that states are moving quickly to adjust their education policies to
support families, rather than school bureaucracies, is another encouraging shift
toward limited government.
States like Pennsylvania are also pushing against unbridled
gubernatorial powers. In the past, Republicans and Democrats criticized
executive overreach when the opposing party was in power. Both parties, however,
rarely moved to restore a separation of powers. Over time, this longstanding
deterioration of checks and balances favored more executive control.
[to top of second column] |
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf delivers his virtual budget address Feb.
3, 2021.
Commonwealth Media Services
But that is changing. For the first time in perhaps
a century, there is a bipartisan trend toward reducing executive
power following governors’ abuses of “emergency” declarations since
March 2020. About 45 states are considering proposals to reduce
their governor’s emergency powers and to restore checks and
balances. Nearly a dozen states have already adopted such policies.
In Ohio and Indiana, for example, Republican legislatures are
responding to overreach from a Republican governor. In New York, a
Democratic legislature is taking on Democrat Andrew Cuomo. And in
Pennsylvania, which became the first state to rein in executive
power through a constitutional amendment, several Democratic
lawmakers joined the Republican legislature in taking on Wolf.
After this past year, there’s a countermovement against government
overreach. Deficit spending among Republicans and Democrats preceded
the pandemic, but emerging state trends show that America isn’t
doomed to insolvency and unchecked bureaucratic growth.
If anything, America may be entering an age of saner policies, which
happened in both 1994 and 2010. The Republican Revolution of 1994,
which handed the speaker’s gavel to Newt Gingrich, came on the heels
of President Bill Clinton’s tax hikes. The Tea Party’s 2010 sweep
came as a result of blowback against President Barack Obama’s failed
Recovery Act and the Affordable Care Act.
History suggests that voters will wise up and begin
to push for more responsible policies. Free-market advocates now
have the perfect opportunity to fight back and build on recent
victories. As Americans grow increasingly dissatisfied with the
results of reckless big government, this momentum can inaugurate a
new era of free markets and limited government.
Nathan Benefield is vice president and COO of the
Commonwealth Foundation, Pennsylvania’s free-market think tank. |