U.S. refusal to defend lawmaker in Capitol riot a signal to Trump
-experts
Send a link to a friend
[July 29, 2021]
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice
Department's refusal to defend a Republican congressman accused in a
civil lawsuit of helping to incite the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol
could hamper former President Donald Trump's legal defense in the same
case, experts said.
The department late Tuesday told a federal judge it had declined a
request by Representative Morris "Mo" Brooks to grant him immunity by
covering him under the Westfall Act, which shields federal employees
from being sued for their words or actions in the course of their
employment.
Experts said the move appeared to send a message to Trump, a
co-defendant in the case, ruling out immunity when it warned that
inciting an attack on Congress "is not within the scope of employment of
a Representative - or any federal employee."
Donald Ayer, a senior Justice Department official in the Republican
administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, said:
"The government's filing sends a clear message... No leader in our
government is acting within the scope of his employment when he acts to
subvert the free and fair election by getting people to go up and riot
and interfere."
"The leaders who perpetrated these travesties are personally responsible
for their actions." he added. A spokesman for Brooks could not be
immediately reached for comment.
Brooks and Trump are co-defendants in a lawsuit by Democratic
Representative Eric Swalwell that accuses them of inciting people during
a Jan. 6 rally to attack the Capitol and stop Congress from certifying
President Joe Biden's election victory.
Trump is a defendant in two other similar lawsuits, one filed by
Democratic Representative Bennie Thompson and another on behalf of two
U.S. Capitol police officers.
Trump has so far not publicly requested Justice Department protection in
the case, nor has his attorney Jesse Binnall said whether he intends to
ask the department to take a position.
In a statement, Binnall said: "The Supreme Court has been clear that
presidents cannot be sued for actions that are related to their duties
of office. Addressing Americans about congressional action is a
quintessential presidential duty."
The Justice Department declined to comment.
[to top of second column]
|
Supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump gather in front of the
U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, U.S., January 6, 2021.
REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo
The department riled some Democrats with a pair
of recent decisions that seemed to shield Trump or members of his
administration, though legal experts said the moves were intended to
protect the office of the presidency, not its former occupant.
Trump's primary legal defense in the Swalwell suit has not rested on
the Westfall Act but on a legal doctrine that argues the separation
of powers in the U.S. Constitution broadly grants the president
immunity during his time in office.
"Rousing and controversial speeches are a key function of the
presidency. That is especially true when, as is the case here, the
President is advocating for or against congressional action," his
lawyer wrote in a May 24 filing.
In a footnote, the lawyer added: "Even if former President Trump is
not covered by absolute immunity, as a governmental actor, the
claims against him are also foreclosed by immunity under the
Westfall Act."
Attorney Anne Tindall of the advocacy group Protect Democracy said
the department's filing contains a lot of signs that are "bad news
for Trump."
"Trump's role is even more limited than Brooks' is," said Tindall,
who is representing two Capitol Police officers in a separate
lawsuit alleging Trump incited the riot.
"Brooks has a role in the certification. He has a vote in Congress.
DOJ concluded that the conduct at issue in the litigation is not
sufficiently related to his vote," Tindall said. "Here Trump has no
role at all."
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia
Osterman)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |