With $300 billion state pension liability, lawmakers approve Tier III
plan for one unit of Chicago government
Send a link to a friend
[June 04, 2021] By
Greg Bishop
(The Center Square) – Before lawmakers left
Springfield this week after the end of the spring session, there hasn’t
been much wholesale change to shore up the burden on taxpayers from
growing public sector pension costs.
State Rep. Kelly Burke, D-Evergreen Park, did have one measure for
Chicago Park District pensions. House Bill 417 brought a variety of
changes, including bonding for paying pensions.
“They also create a Tier III for district employees where new employees
will pay 11% of their salaries, instead of 9%, into the pension fund,”
Burke said.
State Rep. Martin McLaughlin supported Burke’s bill, but said it
neglects the statewide pension crunch as Democrats continue to pass new
spending and new programs.
“Numbers don’t lie,” McLaughlin said. “Thirty years ago our pension cost
made up 4% of our budget. Now it makes up almost 30% of our budget.”
This year’s $42 billion budget spends nearly $9.5 billion on the state’s
pension funds.
The Barrington Hills Republican said lawmakers have to address pensions
on all levels of government because taxpayers can only cover so much.
[to top of second column]
|
State Rep. Kelly Burke, D-Evergreen Park, and state Rep. Martin
McLaughlin, R-Barrington Hills, debate House Bill 417 Monday.
“Why should this be incredibly important to my
democratic friends on the other side of the aisle? You are
constantly proposing spending programs, social programs, healthcare
programs,” McLaughlin said.
Meanwhile, municipalities across the state continue to grapple with
increased pension costs. In Springfield, Budget Director Bill
McCarty told the city council the problem makes it difficult to
provide basic services or hire new police officers or public works
crews.
“That’s where that money’s got to come from, or it’s new revenue,”
McCarty said Tuesday. “It’s basic math.”
Springfield used almost all of its share of property taxes to pay
pension costs. Other municipalities across the state do the same.
Some have had to cut services to cover pension costs.
|