|
 This decade’s redistricting process in Illinois has been marked
by stumbles and self-serving partisanship.
The COVID-19 pandemic has delayed the Census Bureau from providing the detailed
count of populations needed to accurately apportion districts of equal
population, as required by the state and federal constitutions. But the Illinois
General Assembly went ahead anyway, drawing predictably partisan maps.
Despite his repeated promises to veto any partisan maps, on June 4 Gov. J.B.
Pritzker signed both the gerrymandered legislative and judicial maps lawmakers
sent to his desk.
Legislative map
The Illinois Constitution establishes deadlines for the General Assembly to pass
a plan for redistricting their own districts. Members must pass a plan by June
30, or the responsibility is delegated to a bipartisan commission made of four
Democrats and four Republicans.
If that commission cannot approve a map with five votes by Aug. 10, a
tie-breaking ninth member is chosen at random from the names of one Democrat and
one Republican by Sept. 5. The expanded commission then has until Oct. 5 to file
a redistricting plan approved by five members.
With the complete census numbers delayed until mid-to-late August and the
tabulated numbers not available until the end of September, Illinois Democrats
are left with a choice: draw the maps in the General Assembly without the
complete census data, or let constitutional deadlines pass and send the
redistricting responsibility to a bipartisan backup commission, and ultimately
to a 50-50 chance of a Republican tiebreaker. The Democrats chose to use
incomplete data.
Democrats in the General Assembly revealed their proposed maps after working
behind closed doors. According to public hearings held on those maps, in lieu of
complete census data Democrats used data from the 2019 American Community
Survey. Those estimates are based on surveys of communities over the course of
five years.
Statewide census numbers, which have been readily available before the more
granular data necessary for legislative redistricting, showed the estimates were
off by almost 42,000 Illinoisans. But reform groups argue those thousands of
people cannot be incorporated in maps that do not use the census data.
Illinois put a lot of resources into the census numbers, spending $47.8 million
to make sure Illinoisans were counted in the census. Activists argue that by
ignoring the up-to-date census numbers in redistricting, those efforts will have
been wasted. Also, because Illinois is becoming an increasingly diverse state,
overlooking the additional residents counted in the 2020 U.S. Census is likely
to disproportionally affect minority communities.
Democrats’ proposed maps also drew criticism for brazen partisanship. Republican
incumbents were pitted against each other in three districts in maps proposed by
Democratic legislators. These members would be forced to run against each other
in primaries or move, unless they want to quit. That would be nothing new:
Democrats did the same thing in the last redistricting cycle, and Republicans
did the same when they controlled the map-making process.
But after holding public hearings for two days on the proposed maps, Democrats
released revised maps that would reconfigure some districts to accommodate
concerns of packing incumbents into the same districts. These revised maps were
passed in House Bill 2777 and Pritzker signed them into law on June 4.
Reform groups have called for Illinois to ask the courts to waive the deadlines
required by the constitution in light of delayed census numbers. Activists point
to California and Oregon where the plaintiffs successfully petitioned their own
state supreme courts for relief from constitutional deadlines. Michigan’s
redistricting commission petitioned Michigan’s supreme court for similar relief.
[
to
top of second column] |
While Oklahoma has already drawn its maps with
estimates, it has committed to redrawing the maps once the full
census numbers come in. The California legislature’s petition did
not face any significant opposition and received support from both
the secretary of state and the redistricting commission. It remains
to be seen if these sorts of petitions would go unchallenged in
other states.
Congressional maps
Congressional redistricting plans do not have the same
constitutional deadlines state legislative redistricting does, and
Illinois Democrats have opted to delay any congressional remap until
the full census numbers come out. That could have something to do
with the fact congressional redistricting is especially strict,
requiring districts as close to equal in population as practical,
meaning there is virtually no way to draw districts without the
official census numbers.
Those numbers would come out just before congressional candidates’
window to circulate nominating petitions begins. That means
candidates would have to sit on their petitions until a map is
finalized, cutting down on their ability to gain ballot access in
the March primaries. Democrats are looking at postponing the
primaries until June 2022 to give candidates more time.
Despite the lack of complete census data, the statewide data means
Illinois will lose a congressional seat this cycle. No one knows
which representative’s district will be eliminated, although Crain’s
Chicago Business reported Democratic leaders were seeing a map that
could cost Republicans two seats in the U.S. House. The Illinois
Congressional Delegation would then have 14 Democrats and three
Republicans, rather than the current 13-5 split, diminishing GOP
representation even further.
Judicial map
Neither the state nor federal constitution mandates judicial
redistricting, although the state constitution requires one district
consist of Cook County, and the “remainder of
the State shall be divided by law into four Judicial Districts of
substantially equal population, each of which shall be compact and
composed of contiguous counties.”
Illinois’ judicial districts have not been redrawn since 1963, but
Pritzker signed Senate Bill 642 into law June 4. Democratic
lawmakers cited significant changes in population and demographics
since 1963 to justify the change.
The new districts are expected to give Democrats an edge over the
current districts in judicial elections, an edge they would likely
need to keep a majority on the state supreme court after Justice
Thomas Kilbride became the first Illinois Supreme Court justice to
lose a retention election. Despite the fact these maps do not have
the same strict deadlines the legislative maps do, they were also
passed with estimates instead of waiting for the complete census
numbers.
Pritzker had during the campaign and repeatedly as governor promised
to veto any gerrymandered maps, but he walked back that promise. He
fully broke it June 4 when he signed both legislative and judicial
redistricting plans into law.
It is likely these maps will end up in court, where they could be
sent back to the General Assembly to be redrawn. Or, the Illinois
Supreme Court justices might follow the lead of Pennsylvania’s
supreme court and redraw the district lines on their own.
Much of this controversy could have been avoided had the Illinois
Constitution been amended to take redistricting out of the hands of
lawmakers and put in the hands of an independent redistricting
commission.
Fifteen states have already established such commissions for
legislative redistricting, some with positive results. Illinois
needs to do the same if it is ever going to avoid the partisan
gerrymandering that has been the hallmark of past redistricting
cycles.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |
