Investors sue U.S.
regulator over Trump-era AGM resolution rules
Send a link to a friend
[June 16, 2021] By
Ross Kerber
(Reuters) -A group of investors sued Wall
Street's regulator on Tuesday over rule changes that raise the bar for
filing resolutions at annual shareholder meetings to call for new
priorities or reforms.
The group is concerned that the changes, pushed through in 2020 by
appointees of former U.S. President Donald Trump and set to take effect
next year, will restrict shareholder democracy just as activist
investors are starting to drive significant change in Corporate America.
More top funds are throwing their weight behind investor challenges to
companies on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and are
putting companies on notice by choosing to publicize how and why they
voted.
The investors argue the new U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) rules make it harder to hold companies accountable over hot-button
issues such as climate change or workforce diversity, and want them set
aside.
"This was a political rulemaking not warranted by the record or the
evidence," said Danielle Fugere, president of As You Sow, a California
shareholder activist group and one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit
filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
The two other plaintiffs are James McRitchie, an individual investor and
frequent filer of shareholder resolutions, and the Interfaith Center on
Corporate Responsibility, which represents religious groups and other
institutional investors.
SEC representatives did not respond to questions about the lawsuit on
Tuesday.
SEC commissioners voted 3-2 along party lines last September for changes
including raising the threshold value of shares investors must own to
file resolutions and the support levels needed to resubmit them.
Investors soon will need at least $25,000 of a company's shares if they
want to file a resolution after they have held the stock for one year,
for instance. They currently need to own at least $2,000 to do the same.
They will be able to file a resolution owning $2,000 worth of stock only
after they have held it for three years.
Asked about the lawsuit, Tom Quaadman, an official who follows capital
markets for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce trade group, said it supported
the rule changes "as they reflect the needs of global 21st century
capital markets that must be competitive and not push the interest of
special interest activists who push agendas unrelated to economic
return.”
GAINING TRACTION
ESG resolutions have gained more traction lately. A forthcoming analysis
from proxy solicitor Georgeson, details of which were given to Reuters,
found the pass rate of environmental resolutions at Russell 3000
companies rose to 36% so far this year, up from 21% in 2020, while
support for proposals on social topics rose to 18% from 10% in the same
period.
[to top of second column] |
Gary Gensler, new chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, testifies at a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs
Committee hearing - long before he took the SEC post - on Capitol
Hill on July 30, 2013. REUTERS/Jose Luis Magana/File Photo
Many more were withdrawn as companies agreed to make changes like releasing
workforce demographic information.
Georgeson Senior Managing Director Hannah Orowitz, who said the company did not
have a position on the regulations, said if left in place the changes would
likely cut back on future ESG-related proposals despite their rising popularity.
She cited one calling on Dupont to report on plastic pollution that won a record
81% support after it was resubmitted for the company's meeting in May, but which
would barely have been allowed to be considered under the new thresholds given
the limited support a similar proposal received in 2019.
Dupont representatives did not respond to questions.
The Democratic administration of President Joe Biden has taken several steps to
encourage sustainable investing, including a declaration by the Labor Department
that it will not enforce Trump-era rules curbing the use of environmental and
social factors in retirement accounts.
Under new chair Gary Gensler, appointed by Biden in February, the SEC is
gathering comments on such topics as how it might have companies report data
like carbon emissions.
Senate Democrats had introduced a resolution to undo the SEC changes on
shareholder proposals, but a deadline to move it has passed.
The investor lawsuit claims the Trump-era SEC failed "woefully" to account for
the benefits to shareholders of allowing more resolutions, such as stronger
corporate performance. It alleges the regulator placed undue emphasis on the
costs of the resolutions for the companies, which the regulator has previously
pegged at up to $150,000.
The SEC also failed to account for a study by its staff that found the rules
could reduce the number of resolutions up to 78%, the lawsuit states.
The case is Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility et al v SEC, U.S.
District Court, District of Columbia, No. 21-01620.
(Reporting by Ross Kerber in BostonEditing by Greg Roumeliotis, Sonya Hepinstall
and Matthew Lewis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |