U.S. Senate Democrats aim to advance contentious federal voting rights
bill
Send a link to a friend
[June 21, 2021]
By Richard Cowan and Susan Cornwell
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats in the
U.S. Senate this week will try to advance legislation setting new
national election standards, seeking to counter voting-rights rollbacks
that Republican legislatures are pursuing across the country.
Senate Democrats spent the weekend trying to finalize a bill that could
win the support of all 50 Democrats and independents in the 100-member
chamber, even as Republicans showed no signs of joining an effort that
would expand voting by mail and change the way congressional districts
are drawn in an effort to prevent them from being designed along
partisan lines.
If the Democrats' effort sputters this week and no further negotiations
succeed, it could allow new, restrictive voting rules in some
Republican-led states to stand, unless they are struck down in court
challenges.
But it also could embolden Democrats to try to scrap or modify the
Senate's long-standing "filibuster" rule requiring 60 votes to advance
most legislation. Such a move could leave Republicans powerless if the
Senate's 48 Democrats and two independents stick together, given that
Vice President Kamala Harris, also a Democrat, has the power to break
50-50 ties.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has scheduled a procedural vote for
Tuesday to let the Senate begin debating an election reform bill.
"We are working to come up with an agreement to compromise with Joe
Manchin," Schumer told reporters on Sunday.
Manchin, a moderate Democratic senator, opposes a broader bill passed by
the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives in March, and offered
his own election reform ideas last week.
But with Senate Republicans poised to withhold their support, Schumer is
unlikely to get the 60 votes needed to begin debate on a bill.
The Democratic-led push for federal voting rights legislation comes as
Republican legislatures in politically pivotal states such as Georgia,
Florida and Iowa passed sweeping voting restrictions following former
President Donald Trump's defeat last November and his unsubstantiated
claims of widespread voter fraud.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) talks to reporters
following the Senate Democrats weekly policy lunch at the U.S.
Capitol in Washington, U.S., June 15, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Democrats and voting rights advocates have sued state
officials over the new laws, saying they will disproportionately
disenfranchise voters of color, who helped propel Democratic
President Joe Biden to victory last November.
'FEDERAL TAKEOVER'
Republican lawmakers on Sunday reiterated their strong opposition to
Democrats' federal election proposals.
Senator Lindsey Graham, interviewed on "Fox News Sunday," called the
House bill "the biggest power grab in the history of the country,"
while Senator Rob Portman denounced what he called "a federal
takeover of our election system" from the states, in an interview
with NBC's "Meet the Press."
If Schumer can win over all 50 of his senators, including Manchin,
he will be able to take his argument to the country that Republicans
alone stymied a voting reform debate in the aftermath of efforts by
Trump to overturn his election loss.
The 2020 presidential election saw the largest total turnout in U.S.
history, as states temporarily opened up voting procedures, such as
extended hours for casting ballots in person and expanded
opportunities for mail-in voting because of the coronavirus pandemic
raging at the time.
Many Republicans are trying to roll back those provisions, citing
the need to improve election security. Dozens of judges rejected
lawsuits asserting voting irregularities, and election officials
across the country have said last year's vote was safe and secure.
(Reporting by Richard Cowan and Susan Cornwell; Editing by Soyoung
Kim and Peter Cooney)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |