Bill capping township general assistance funds on Pritzker desk
Send a link to a friend
[June 24, 2021]
By Greg Bishop
(The Center Square) – Townships in Illinois
would be required to either lower taxes or even possibly rebate excess
general assistance funds to taxpayers under a bill that’s on Gov. J.B.
Pritzker’s desk.
In 2017, a measure from state Rep. Brad Halbrook, R-Shelbyville, was
enacted that prohibits townships from having more than 2.5 times the
annual average expenditures in reserves of the previous three fiscal
years.
“There was a 1969 Supreme Court case based out of Adams County that a
local businessman said that his county is overtaxing because of the
large fund balances that they had and he was proven right because of the
decision of the Supreme Court,” Halbrook said.
Halbrook’s measure enacted in 2017 excluded a township’s capital fund
from the cap.
This year, Senate Bill 1799 from state Sen. Tom Cullerton, D-Villa Park,
adds township general assistance funds to that cap. The bill passed both
chambers nearly unanimously.
“This bill I believe just kind of reiterates what we put into practice
two years ago,” Halbrook said.
If SB1799 is signed by the governor, it could lead to lower taxes.
“If you see yourself bumping up, as a township board, you see yourself
bumping up and you may be going over that number, you just need to
reduce your levy in the coming years to avoid that,” Halbrook said.
[to top of second column]
|
State Rep. Brad Halbrook,
R-Shelbyville, talks about the prohibition on townships to
not carry more than 2.5 times their expenditures
Greg Bishop / The Center Square
There is already a provision in the state law that
allows townships with excess reserves on hand to rebate funds back
to taxpayers, he said.
“If you’re faced with a situation to where you have a huge excess of
those numbers there is a provision where you can rebate that back to
the property owners,” Halbrook said.
Halbrook said the bill he passed in 2017 has already led to such
actions in one township.
“Shelbyville township at one time had a million-and-a-half dollar
surplus, excess funds, above that number,” Halbrook said. “I think
they ultimately rebated back $735,000 to 2,200 plus-or-minus
property owners in that township.”
|