Kashkari wrote in the newspaper on Monday that the losses in the
banking sector were far smaller than his analysis during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
"Does their performance during the COVID downturn indicate that
large banks are strong enough? No, it does not," he wrote,
adding that the losses in the banking sector were much smaller
than expected because governments were aggressive in providing
fiscal support for families and businesses affected by the
crisis.
While Kashkari said it was right on the part of fiscal
authorities to support the economy during the COVID-19 downturn,
he added that "this was also a banking bailout."
"Absent these fiscal interventions, losses in the banking sector
would have been much larger," he wrote in the newspaper.
"The public must decide: should banks be resilient on their own
or always dependent upon the generosity of taxpayers?"
Laws and rules passed since the 2007-2009 crisis have forced
banks to increase the capital they have on hand against losses,
but Kashkari has urged even higher requirements.
In April 2020, Kashkari said that big U.S. banks should raise
$200 billion in capital and stop paying dividends to prepare for
the deep economic downturn due to the coronavirus. "Banks did
not heed my advice", he wrote.
(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Ana
Nicolaci da Costa)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|