To go electric, America needs more mines. Can it build them?
Send a link to a friend
[March 02, 2021] By
Ernest Scheyder
(Reuters) - Last September, in the arid
hills of northern Nevada, a cluster of flowers found nowhere else on
earth died mysteriously overnight.
Conservationists were quick to suspect ioneer Ltd, an Australian firm
that wants to mine the lithium that lies beneath the flowers for use in
electric vehicle (EV) batteries.
One conservation group alleged in a lawsuit that the flowers, known as
Tiehm's buckwheat, were "dug up and destroyed." The rare plant posed a
problem for ioneer because U.S. officials may soon add it to the
Endangered Species List, which could scuttle the mining project.
Ioneer denies harming the flowers. Their cause of death remains hotly
debated - as does the fate of the lithium mine.
The clash of environmental priorities underpinning the battle over
Tiehm's buckwheat - conservation vs. green energy - is a microcosm of a
much larger political quandary for the new administration of President
Joe Biden, who has made big promises to environmentalists as well as
labor groups and others who stand to benefit by boosting mining.
To please conservationists, Biden has vowed to set aside at least 30% of
U.S. federal land and coastal areas for conservation, triple current
levels.
But that aim could conflict with his promises to hasten the
electrification of vehicles and to reduce the country's dependence on
China for rare earths, lithium and other minerals needed for EV
batteries. The administration has called the reliance on China a
national security threat.
The administration will be forced into hard choices that anger one
constituency or another.
"You can't have green energy without mining," Mark Senti, chief
executive of Florida-based rare earth magnet company Advanced Magnet Lab
Inc. "That's just the reality."
Rare earth magnets are used to make a range of consumer electronics as
well as precision-guided missiles and other weapons.
Two sources familiar with White House deliberations on domestic mining
told Reuters that Biden plans to allow mines that produce EV metals to
be developed under existing environmental standards, rather than face a
tightened process that would apply to mining for other materials, such
as coal.
Biden is open to allowing more mines on federal land, the sources said,
but won't give the industry carte blanche to dig everywhere. That will
likely mean approval of mines for rare earths and lithium, though
certain copper projects – including a proposed Arizona copper mine from
Rio Tinto Plc opposed by Native Americans - are likely to face extra
scrutiny, the sources said.
The White House declined to comment for this article.
DIGGING NEEDED
Demand for metals used in EV batteries is expected to rise sharply as
automakers including Tesla Inc, BMW and General Motors plan major
expansions of EV production. California, the biggest U.S. vehicle
market, aims to entirely ban fossil fuel-powered engines by 2035.
Biden has promised to convert the entire U.S. government fleet - about
640,000 vehicles - to EVs. That plan alone could require a 12-fold
increase in U.S. lithium production by 2030, according to Benchmark
Minerals Intelligence, as well as increases in output of domestic
copper, nickel and cobalt. Federal land is teeming with many of these EV
metals, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
"There is no way there's enough raw materials being produced right now
to start replacing millions of gasoline-powered motor vehicles with EVs,"
said Lewis Black, CEO of Almonty Industries Inc, which mines the
hardening metal tungsten in Portugal and South Korea.
Despite that shortage, proposed U.S. mines from Rio Tinto Ltd, BHP Group
Ltd, Antofagasta Plc, Lithium Americas Corp, Glencore Plc and others are
drawing stiff opposition from conservation groups. The projects would
supply enough lithium for more than 5 million EV batteries and enough
copper for more than 10,000 EVs each year.
Mining companies insist that federal lands can still be protected while
the U.S. boosts output of minerals needed to accelerate the EV
transition.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump and the mining industry "pushed the
narrative that we need to mine everywhere and undercut environmental
safeguards in order to build more batteries," said Drew McConville of
The Wilderness Society, a conservation group. "We have confidence that
the Biden administration is going to see through that false narrative."
[to top of second column] |
A wheel loader operator fills a truck with ore at the MP Materials
rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, U.S. January 30, 2020.
REUTERS/Steve Marcus
Earthworks and other environmental groups are now lobbying automakers to only
buy metals from mines deemed environmentally friendly by the Initiative for
Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), a nonprofit group. BMW, Ford Motor Co and
Daimler have agreed to abide by IRMA guidelines, and other automakers may follow
suit.
PROJECTS AT RISK
Biden has not weighed in on two controversial copper mine projects in
Minnesota's environmentally-sensitive Boundary Waters region from PolyMet Mining
Corp and Antofagasta Plc's Twin Metals subsidiary.
Tom Vilsack - the secretary of agriculture, the department that oversees the
Boundary Waters - has in the past opposed the Twin Metals project, arguing that
it threatened wilderness and marshlands.
Deb Haaland, the new secretary of interior, the department that controls most
federal land, previously voted for a bill that would have banned copper sulfide
mining in northern Minnesota. That bill, authored by U.S. Representative Betty
McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, will be reintroduced this month, her aides told
Reuters.
Conservationists nonetheless remain concerned that the appeal of copper for EVs
and other renewable energy devices may help the mines ultimately get approved.
"If these were coal mines, I'd feel much more comfortable knowing they wouldn't
be approved," said Pete Marshall of Friends of the Boundary Waters.
WORRIES ABOUT WILDLIFE, SACRED GROUNDS, FLOWERS
In Arizona, Biden promised Native Americans - whose votes helped him win the
battleground state - that they would have a "seat at the table" if he defeated
Trump. Many Native Americans are worried that Rio Tinto's Resolution proposed
copper mine would destroy sacred sites considered home to religious deities.
On Monday afternoon, Biden administration officials blocked a land swap Rio
needs to build the mine. Trump officials had previously approved that land swap.
Other controversial projects include Idaho's Stibnite proposed mine, from John
Paulson-backed Perpetua Resources Corp, which is under fresh scrutiny by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency staff over fears it would pollute Native
American fishing grounds. The mine would produce gold and antimony, used to make
alloys for EV batteries.
In Nevada, the Department of Wildlife worries that the lithium mines planned by
Lithium Americas and others would harm trout, deer and pronghorn habitats. The
Lithium Americas mine received federal approval last month, but ranchers have
sued the U.S. government to reverse that decision.
"Renewable energy and electric cars aren't green if they destroy an important
habitat and drive wildlife extinct," said Kelly Fuller, of the Western
Watersheds Project, which opposes the Lithium Americas project.
In Nevada, the death of the Tiehm's buckwheat flowers at ioneer's proposed mine
site remains a point of contention. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said that
thirsty squirrels may have gnawed the roots of more than 17,000 flowers for
water amid a drought in the state.
The Center for Biological Diversity, which opposes the mine, said there was
evidence that humans destroyed the flowers. "The targeted nature of the damage,
combined with the lack of feces, pawprints, hoofprints, or other evidence of
wildlife suggest human involvement," the group said in a court filing.
The Fish and Wildlife Service is now set to rule this summer on whether the
flower is an endangered species - a designation that would prevent development
on much of the land ioneer is trying to mine.
Ioneer has hired scientists to move the flowers to a new site, though it's
unclear if that process will succeed. "We can extract this lithium and also save
this flower," said James Calaway, ioneer's chairman.
(Reporting by Ernest Scheyder; additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt; editing
by Amran Abocar and Brian Thevenot)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |