| 
		To go electric, America needs more mines. Can it build them?
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 02, 2021]  By 
		Ernest Scheyder 
 (Reuters) - Last September, in the arid 
		hills of northern Nevada, a cluster of flowers found nowhere else on 
		earth died mysteriously overnight.
 
 Conservationists were quick to suspect ioneer Ltd, an Australian firm 
		that wants to mine the lithium that lies beneath the flowers for use in 
		electric vehicle (EV) batteries.
 
 One conservation group alleged in a lawsuit that the flowers, known as 
		Tiehm's buckwheat, were "dug up and destroyed." The rare plant posed a 
		problem for ioneer because U.S. officials may soon add it to the 
		Endangered Species List, which could scuttle the mining project.
 
 Ioneer denies harming the flowers. Their cause of death remains hotly 
		debated - as does the fate of the lithium mine.
 
 The clash of environmental priorities underpinning the battle over 
		Tiehm's buckwheat - conservation vs. green energy - is a microcosm of a 
		much larger political quandary for the new administration of President 
		Joe Biden, who has made big promises to environmentalists as well as 
		labor groups and others who stand to benefit by boosting mining.
 
		
		 
		
 To please conservationists, Biden has vowed to set aside at least 30% of 
		U.S. federal land and coastal areas for conservation, triple current 
		levels.
 
 But that aim could conflict with his promises to hasten the 
		electrification of vehicles and to reduce the country's dependence on 
		China for rare earths, lithium and other minerals needed for EV 
		batteries. The administration has called the reliance on China a 
		national security threat.
 
 The administration will be forced into hard choices that anger one 
		constituency or another.
 
 "You can't have green energy without mining," Mark Senti, chief 
		executive of Florida-based rare earth magnet company Advanced Magnet Lab 
		Inc. "That's just the reality."
 
 Rare earth magnets are used to make a range of consumer electronics as 
		well as precision-guided missiles and other weapons.
 
 Two sources familiar with White House deliberations on domestic mining 
		told Reuters that Biden plans to allow mines that produce EV metals to 
		be developed under existing environmental standards, rather than face a 
		tightened process that would apply to mining for other materials, such 
		as coal.
 
 Biden is open to allowing more mines on federal land, the sources said, 
		but won't give the industry carte blanche to dig everywhere. That will 
		likely mean approval of mines for rare earths and lithium, though 
		certain copper projects – including a proposed Arizona copper mine from 
		Rio Tinto Plc opposed by Native Americans - are likely to face extra 
		scrutiny, the sources said.
 
 The White House declined to comment for this article.
 
 DIGGING NEEDED
 
 Demand for metals used in EV batteries is expected to rise sharply as 
		automakers including Tesla Inc, BMW and General Motors plan major 
		expansions of EV production. California, the biggest U.S. vehicle 
		market, aims to entirely ban fossil fuel-powered engines by 2035.
 
 Biden has promised to convert the entire U.S. government fleet - about 
		640,000 vehicles - to EVs. That plan alone could require a 12-fold 
		increase in U.S. lithium production by 2030, according to Benchmark 
		Minerals Intelligence, as well as increases in output of domestic 
		copper, nickel and cobalt. Federal land is teeming with many of these EV 
		metals, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
 
 "There is no way there's enough raw materials being produced right now 
		to start replacing millions of gasoline-powered motor vehicles with EVs," 
		said Lewis Black, CEO of Almonty Industries Inc, which mines the 
		hardening metal tungsten in Portugal and South Korea.
 
 Despite that shortage, proposed U.S. mines from Rio Tinto Ltd, BHP Group 
		Ltd, Antofagasta Plc, Lithium Americas Corp, Glencore Plc and others are 
		drawing stiff opposition from conservation groups. The projects would 
		supply enough lithium for more than 5 million EV batteries and enough 
		copper for more than 10,000 EVs each year.
 
 Mining companies insist that federal lands can still be protected while 
		the U.S. boosts output of minerals needed to accelerate the EV 
		transition.
 
 Former U.S. President Donald Trump and the mining industry "pushed the 
		narrative that we need to mine everywhere and undercut environmental 
		safeguards in order to build more batteries," said Drew McConville of 
		The Wilderness Society, a conservation group. "We have confidence that 
		the Biden administration is going to see through that false narrative."
 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			A wheel loader operator fills a truck with ore at the MP Materials 
			rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, U.S. January 30, 2020. 
			REUTERS/Steve Marcus 
            
			 
Earthworks and other environmental groups are now lobbying automakers to only 
buy metals from mines deemed environmentally friendly by the Initiative for 
Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), a nonprofit group. BMW, Ford Motor Co and 
Daimler have agreed to abide by IRMA guidelines, and other automakers may follow 
suit. 
PROJECTS AT RISK
 Biden has not weighed in on two controversial copper mine projects in 
Minnesota's environmentally-sensitive Boundary Waters region from PolyMet Mining 
Corp and Antofagasta Plc's Twin Metals subsidiary.
 
 Tom Vilsack - the secretary of agriculture, the department that oversees the 
Boundary Waters - has in the past opposed the Twin Metals project, arguing that 
it threatened wilderness and marshlands.
 
 Deb Haaland, the new secretary of interior, the department that controls most 
federal land, previously voted for a bill that would have banned copper sulfide 
mining in northern Minnesota. That bill, authored by U.S. Representative Betty 
McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, will be reintroduced this month, her aides told 
Reuters.
 
Conservationists nonetheless remain concerned that the appeal of copper for EVs 
and other renewable energy devices may help the mines ultimately get approved.
 "If these were coal mines, I'd feel much more comfortable knowing they wouldn't 
be approved," said Pete Marshall of Friends of the Boundary Waters.
 
 WORRIES ABOUT WILDLIFE, SACRED GROUNDS, FLOWERS
 
 In Arizona, Biden promised Native Americans - whose votes helped him win the 
battleground state - that they would have a "seat at the table" if he defeated 
Trump. Many Native Americans are worried that Rio Tinto's Resolution proposed 
copper mine would destroy sacred sites considered home to religious deities.
 
On Monday afternoon, Biden administration officials blocked a land swap Rio 
needs to build the mine. Trump officials had previously approved that land swap.
 Other controversial projects include Idaho's Stibnite proposed mine, from John 
Paulson-backed Perpetua Resources Corp, which is under fresh scrutiny by U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency staff over fears it would pollute Native 
American fishing grounds. The mine would produce gold and antimony, used to make 
alloys for EV batteries.
 
 In Nevada, the Department of Wildlife worries that the lithium mines planned by 
Lithium Americas and others would harm trout, deer and pronghorn habitats. The 
Lithium Americas mine received federal approval last month, but ranchers have 
sued the U.S. government to reverse that decision.
 
 
 
"Renewable energy and electric cars aren't green if they destroy an important 
habitat and drive wildlife extinct," said Kelly Fuller, of the Western 
Watersheds Project, which opposes the Lithium Americas project.
 
 In Nevada, the death of the Tiehm's buckwheat flowers at ioneer's proposed mine 
site remains a point of contention. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said that 
thirsty squirrels may have gnawed the roots of more than 17,000 flowers for 
water amid a drought in the state.
 
 The Center for Biological Diversity, which opposes the mine, said there was 
evidence that humans destroyed the flowers. "The targeted nature of the damage, 
combined with the lack of feces, pawprints, hoofprints, or other evidence of 
wildlife suggest human involvement," the group said in a court filing.
 
 The Fish and Wildlife Service is now set to rule this summer on whether the 
flower is an endangered species - a designation that would prevent development 
on much of the land ioneer is trying to mine.
 
 Ioneer has hired scientists to move the flowers to a new site, though it's 
unclear if that process will succeed. "We can extract this lithium and also save 
this flower," said James Calaway, ioneer's chairman.
 
 (Reporting by Ernest Scheyder; additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt; editing 
by Amran Abocar and Brian Thevenot)
 
				 
			[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |