| The 
				Institute for Fiscal Studies also said it was very unlikely that 
				Sunak would be able to deliver the 17 billion pounds ($23.7 
				billion) of annual spending cuts included in his plan for the 
				middle of the decade.
 IFS director Paul Johnson said if the plan was implemented as 
				announced on Wednesday, Sunak would meet one definition of a 
				balanced budget - borrowing only to invest – by 2025-26.
 
 "The sad truth is that that would be a balance built on the 
				highest sustained tax burden in UK history and yet further cuts 
				in unprotected public service spending," Johnson said.
 
 "That is perhaps one measure of the difficulties presented by 
				more than a decade of paltry growth followed by the deepest 
				recession in history."
 
 Both the IFS and the Resolution Foundation raised questions 
				about Sunak's ability to raise corporation tax to 25% in 2023 
				from its current rate of 19%.
 
 "I will be amazed if in two years the CBI (Confederation of 
				British Industry) is not saying it is absolutely bonkers that we 
				are raising corporation tax to 25%, whereas 23% I think maybe 
				they would have got away with," Resolution Foundation director 
				Torsten Bell said.
 
 Sunak says the 25% rate would be lower in headline terms than in 
				other countries in the G7 group of richer nations.
 
 However Britain has fewer exemptions from the tax and the IFS 
				estimated that under Sunak's plans, Britain would be collecting 
				a higher share of national income through the tax than the 
				United States, Germany, France or Italy.
 
 Bell at the Resolution Foundation said Sunak was likely to face 
				pressure to ease the measure from Conservative Party lawmakers 
				who believed low taxation was a bigger priority than reducing 
				debt levels.
 
 ($1 = 0.7178 pounds)
 
 (Reporting by William Schomberg and David Milliken)
 
			[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
				 
				  |  |