| 
		Bill would end restraint and isolation of students
		 Send a link to a friend 
		[March 04, 2021] 
		By PETER HANCOCKCapitol News Illinois
 phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
 
 
  SPRINGFIELD – A House committee agreed 
		Wednesday to continue working on a bill that aims to end the use of 
		physical restraints and isolation as a way of controlling misbehaving 
		students in public school classrooms. 
 House Bill 219, sponsored by Rep. Jonathan Carroll, D-Northbrook, was 
		introduced in response to a 2019 article by Pro Publica Illinois and the 
		Chicago Tribune that documented the extent to which those practices are 
		used in Illinois schools and the harmful effects they have on children.
 
 Carroll said he was subjected to isolation and restraint when he was a 
		child and that he still lives with the memory of those events.
 
 “The fact that we lead the country in these is disgraceful,” he told a 
		House education policy committee. “It’s something that I don’t sleep at 
		night thinking it could happen to my children.”
 
		
		 
		
 If approved, the bill would prohibit the use of “prone restraint,” in 
		which a person is held face-down on the floor or other surface while 
		pressure is applied to the student’s body to keep him or her in that 
		position, as well as mechanical and chemical restraint.
 
 The bill also provides that timeouts, isolated timeouts and other forms 
		of physical restraint could only be used when the student’s behavior 
		poses an “imminent danger of serious physical harm to the student or to 
		others,” and it would direct the Illinois State Board of Education to 
		develop a plan for greatly reducing the use of those practices over the 
		next three years.
 
 Cheryl Jansen, public policy director for the disability rights 
		organization Equip for Equality, said there is a large body of research 
		into the effects and dangers of restraint and seclusion.
 
 “And what those resources have also demonstrated is that the use of 
		restraint and seclusion is not therapeutic, and it's not educational,” 
		she said. “In fact, they may exacerbate the very behaviors that they 
		purport to address.”
 
 Chelsea Filer, founder of the group Breaking Code Silence, told of her 
		own experience being subject to restraint and isolation as a teenager 
		when she was admitted to a residential treatment facility for treatment 
		of her ADHD.
 
 “What I experienced within this facility will haunt me forever,” she 
		said. “I witnessed a common practice of the use of dangerous prone 
		restraints used far too often, and for nearly any reason the staff 
		deemed necessary. To this day, I cannot remember a single incident in 
		which either I or any of my peers were a danger to themselves or others. 
		And yet, we were still restrained and placed in solitary confinement for 
		days, sometimes weeks at a time.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Rep. Jonathan Carroll, sponsor of a bill calling for 
			a ban on the use of prone restraints in public schools, testifies 
			about the bill during a virtual committee hearing Wednesday. 
			(Credit: Blueroomstream.com) 
            
			 
            But Paula Bodzioch, education director for Marklund Day School, 
			which operates residential schools in Illinois for people with 
			profound developmental disabilities who cannot be served in public 
			schools, argued against a complete ban on prone restraints. She said 
			the method is sometimes necessary, as a last result, for a small 
			number of students whose behavior becomes uncontrollable.
 “And I want to make that clear, it is not a go-to, and we understand 
			the ways in which prone restraint has been used in not the best 
			manner,” she said. “But we know that with trained staff, this is not 
			implemented as a punishment, but rather as an emergency procedure to 
			keep the students safe at that time.”
 
 Bodzioch asked the committee to consider carving out an exception in 
			the bill so that prone restraints could still be used in emergency 
			situations after other less drastic efforts to control a student’s 
			behavior have failed.
 
 But Kyle Hillman, of the Illinois Chapter of the National 
			Association of Social Workers, said a number of other states have 
			banned the use of prone restraints, and schools similar to Marklund 
			in those states have found other ways of dealing with students’ 
			violent outbursts.
 
 “And so, when we talk about carving out exemptions, we're kind of 
			setting a precedent of saying that some kids shouldn't be saved from 
			these barbaric things and others,” he said.
 
            
			 
			Still, some Republicans on the committee, including Reps. Avery 
			Bourne, of Morrisonville, and Steven Reick, of Woodstock, said they 
			believed there should be an exception for the use of prone 
			restraints, if a parent or guardian consents to its use, and Carroll 
			agreed to pull the bill from consideration so he could meet with 
			stakeholders to discuss drafting such an amendment.
 Carroll said he would bring the bill back to the committee next 
			week.
 
 Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 
			news service covering state government and distributed to more than 
			400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois 
			Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
 |