The
Public Utility Commission deferred voting on a separate proposal
to slice service fees that would have saved retail electric
providers about $1.5 billion for power never provided. Both
proposals were recommended by the state's independent power
market adviser.
Total electricity charges jumped by about $47 billion during a
winter storm that knocked out nearly half of Texas power plants,
hiking prices for gas and power that have roiled the state's
energy sector. Storm-related costs sent one company into
bankruptcy and a dozen more face being unplugged from the
state's grid for non-payment.
"The PUC choose to ignore the recommendation of the economists
hired by the state to advise regulators," Brandon Young, chief
executive of Payless Power, an electricity marketer, said in an
interview. "As a result, $16 billion in costs are being passed
to all electric providers -retail electric, municipal providers
and cooperatives."
The state's grid operator had raised power prices to $9,000 per
megawatt hour, to induce power plant operator to increase power
or stay running for five days. However, that 450-times-the-usual
price remained in place after the emergency passed, adding about
$16 billion to the total.
State market adviser Carrie Bivens described that final day's
pricing as a mistake by grid operator Electric Reliability
Council of Texas (ERCOT), recommending the PUC "correct ERCOT's
real time prices."
Revising prices could hurt the companies that had hedged their
power costs and result in greater uncertainty, said
commissioners.
"Decisions were made about these prices in real time based on
information available to everybody," said PUC Chairman Arthur
D'Andrea. "It is impossible to unscramble."
The mistake and fees charged for standby power service that were
provided sparked a firestorm of protests by the dozens of
companies that market electricity in Texas. Commissioners on
Friday deferred a vote on Bivens' call for reducing ancillary
services fees, saying there was no reason to rush.
Vistra Corp, a power plant operator that receives some of the
fees, argued it was unfair for regulators to cherry pick
"certain prices," for a rollback. The ancillary services
commissioners are considering cutting would not reduce
residential bills, it said.
"It would be inappropriate for the Commission to just reprice
ancillary services without addressing the other pricing issues
and challenges," wrote Amanda J. Frazier, a Vistra senior vice
president in a letter to the commission.
Federal and state investigators are examining why the state and
utilities were unprepared for a deep freeze that left up to 4.3
million Texans without power, heat and water. Consumers will see
higher prices as the storm costs get passed down through rate
increases or fewer choices in providers, officials said.
(Reporting by Gary McWilliams; editing by Emelia
Sithole-Matarise and Marguerita Choy)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|