British royals silent amid crisis over Meghan's claim of racist remark
Send a link to a friend
[March 09, 2021]
By Guy Faulconbridge and Michael Holden
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's monarchy
maintained its silence on Tuesday, after Meghan and Prince Harry accused
a family member of making a racist remark about their son and said she
had been alienated to the point of contemplating suicide.
Oprah Winfrey's tell-all TV interview with the couple has dragged the
royals into the biggest crisis since the death of Harry's mother Diana
in 1997, when the family, led by Queen Elizabeth, was widely criticised
for being too slow to respond.
In the two-hour show, originally aired on CBS on Sunday evening, Harry
also said that his father, heir-to-the-throne Prince Charles, had let
him down.
"Worst Royal Crisis in 85 Years," read the front page of the Daily
Mirror newspaper, while the Daily Mail's cover asked "What Have They
Done?". The Sun columnist Trevor Kavanagh questioned if the interview
meant the end for the royals.
"It could hardly be more damaging to the royal family, not least because
there is little it can do to defend itself," The Times said in a lead
article under the title "Royal Attack".
"The key to the monarchy's survival over the centuries has been its
ability to adapt to the needs of the times. It needs to adapt again,"
The Times said.
Elizabeth, who is 94 and has been on the throne for 69 years, wanted to
take some time before the palace issued a response, a royal source said.
Nearly three years since her star-studded wedding in Windsor Castle,
Meghan gained sympathy in the United States by casting some unidentified
members of the British royal family as uncaring, mendacious or guilty of
racist remarks.
She and Harry have also had a torrid relationship with the British
press, and in particular tabloids who have been critical of the couple.
For the monarchy, which traces its history through 1,000 years of
British and English history to William the Conqueror, Meghan's bombshell
has been compared to the crises over the death of Diana and the 1936
abdication of Edward VIII.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson avoided questions about the crisis,
though he serves, in theory, as a servant of the crown and Elizabeth II
is head of the British state as well as 15 other realms including
Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Johnson said he had the highest admiration for the queen but that he did
not want to comment on the interview. New Zealand's Prime Minister
Jacinda Ardern said her nation was unlikely to stop having the queen as
head of state soon.
"DARK SKIN"
Opponents of the monarchy said the allegations made by Meghan and Harry
showed how rotten the institution was.
"Now people are getting a much clearer picture of what the monarchy is
really like. And it doesn't look good," said Graham Smith, head of
Republic, a campaign group which seeks to abolish the monarchy.
[to top of second column]
|
Various commentators give their opinion on Prince Harry and his wife
Meghan's TV interview to Oprah Winfrey, their first since stepping
back from the British royal family a year ago.
"With the queen likely to be replaced by King Charles during this
decade the position of the monarchy has rarely looked weaker," Smith
said.
Some royal supporters cast Meghan, a 39-year-old former U.S. actor,
as a publicity seeker with an eye on Hollywood stardom.
But the gravity of the claims has raised uncomfortable questions
about how the British monarchy, which survived centuries of
revolution that toppled their cousins across Europe, could function
in a meritocratic world.
Meghan, whose mother is Black and father is white, said her son
Archie, who turns two in May, had been denied the title of prince
because there were concerns within the royal family "about how dark
his skin might be when he's born".
She declined to say who had voiced such concerns, as did Harry.
Winfrey later told CBS that Harry had said it was not the queen or
her 99-year-old husband Philip, who has been in hospital for three
weeks while the crisis unfolds.
'DEFERENCE OVER'
Meghan's estranged father Thomas Markle, who she has not spoken to
since her wedding, said on Tuesday he did not think the British
royal family was racist, and hoped that an alleged remark from a
family member about the darkness of the skin of Meghan's son was
just a "dumb question".
"The thing about what colour will the baby be or how dark will the
baby be; I'm guessing and hoping it's just a dumb question from
somebody," Markle told ITV. "It could be somebody asked a stupid
question. Rather than being a total racist."
Harry said his family had cut them off financially, and his father
Prince Charles had let him down and refused to take his calls at one
point.
"The age of deference, already under strain, will vanish with her
passing," Kavanagh wrote, questioning whether the royal family would
survive beyond the popular queen.
Others pointed to the fact that the institution has survived crises
in the past.
"It is obviously damaging because anything that tarnishes their
reputation is bad," royal commentator Penny Junor told Reuters. "But
I think overall it's a strong institution, it's a good institution.
It has served Britain extremely well over the decades. I hope that
it will survive this."
(Reporting by Michael Holden; Editing by Mike Collett-White)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |