Facebook, Google fight bill that would help U.S. news industry
Send a link to a friend
[March 12, 2021] By
Diane Bartz and Helen Coster
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lobbyists for
Facebook and Google threw their weight against new U.S. legislation that
seeks to aid struggling news publishers by allowing them to negotiate
collectively against the tech companies over revenue sharing and other
deals.
U.S. lawmakers introduced the plan in Congress on Wednesday to address a
perceived power imbalance between news outlets and the tech giants.
Critics accuse the companies of using content to drive traffic and ad
revenue to their platforms without fairly compensating the publishers.
The move adds to pressure on the tech firms, which are facing antitrust
lawsuits and the threat of more regulation.
Google, which declined comment on the proposal, launched a website
https://blog.google/
supportingnews#overview on Thursday asserting it is "one of the world's
biggest financial supporters of journalism" by virtue of the ad revenue
and content licensing fees it provides to media. Google said its search
engine sends readers to publishers' websites 24 billion times per month.
Also opposing the bill are two technology industry trade groups that
Facebook and Google belong to -- the Computer & Communications Industry
Association and NetChoice.
"Objective news coverage is a public good, but we don't think the way to
fund that public good is by constructing a cartel," said CCIA President
Matt Schruers.
The group opposed a 2019 version of the legislation and views the
proposed joint bargaining as a way of restricting competition.
Carl Szabo of NetChoice said his goal was to kill the bill or at least
convince lawmakers to amend it so that it would be restricted to smaller
publications, excluding outlets such as the Washington Post or New York
Times.
"I don't think they should be doing this legislation, period," he said.
"This legislation allows the Washington Post and New York Times and
other big papers to call the shots for the smaller outlets."
[to top of second column] |
Attendees walk past a
Facebook logo during Facebook Inc's F8 developers conference in San
Jose, California, U.S., April 30, 2019. REUTERS/Stephen Lam/File
Photo
Some industry observers say the proposal could disproportionately benefit
private equity firms and hedge funds that have snatched up medium and large
newspaper chains. Newspapers such as the Chicago Tribune and the Miami Herald
are controlled by the likes of Alden Global Capital and Chatham Asset
Management.
The bills come not long after Facebook battled with Australia over how much it
should pay news publishers for their content. During the fight, Facebook blacked
out Australian news pages and only restored them once the government granted
concessions.
Facebook declined comment on the new U.S. legislation.
Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat who sponsored the bill in the Senate, said the
Australia dispute illustrated Facebook's outsized clout and the need to give
publishers more leverage. "We have to have an even playing field and allow
people to negotiate," she said Thursday in a congressional hearing.
The tech platforms appear to have few friends in Congress, where Democrats have
been angered by misinformation online and conservatives argue that their views
have been stifled.
Among groups that back the legislation, David Chavern, president and chief
executive of the News Media Alliance, sees collective bargaining as a critical
way to increase the negotiating power of small and medium-size publishers.
"There has to be some kind of dispute resolution mechanism" between platforms
and publishers in addition to collective bargaining, said Chavern, adding that
his group is flexible about what that could entail.
(Reporting by Diane Bartz and Helen Coster; additional reporting by Paresh Dave;
editing by Chris Sanders and Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |