Analysis: Denuclearisation of what? U.S. switch on North Korea wording
raises debate
Send a link to a friend
[March 18, 2021]
By Josh Smith
SEOUL (Reuters) - Officials with U.S.
President Joe Biden's administration have begun emphasising the "denuclearisation
of North Korea", rather than the whole peninsula, in a subtle but
noticeable shift from wording embraced in previous talks with Pyongyang.
In speeches, policy documents, and other communications, senior leaders
including Secretary of State Antony Blinken have regularly adopted the
phrase in a break from the "denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula".
The "peninsula" wording has been used for a decade in many United
Nations Security Council resolutions and international agreements,
including the declaration signed by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and
former U.S. President Donald Trump in Singapore in 2018.
Blinken did not respond to a question about the wording during a
briefing in Seoul on Thursday, but his South Korean counterpart, Foreign
Minister Chung Eui-yong said emphasising the peninsula was "more
correct", highlighting a possible point of difference between the two
allies.
"It means that to North Korea we are showing that South Korea has
already denuclearised... that we have to go along together," Chung said.
"If we can say 'denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula,' we are more
confident that we can convince North Korea to follow our suit."
The night before, South Korea's Ministry of Defense said the allies had
"reaffirmed the common goal of denuclearising the Korean Peninsula",
while the Pentagon said they "noted a commitment to supporting
diplomatic efforts to achieve the denuclearisation of North Korea."
The U.S. change in wording has not been universal, with Secretary of
Defense Lloyd Austin using both phrases during his visit to Seoul with
Blinken this week.
But experts and Western diplomatic sources said the new emphasis is
deliberate and will be noted.
"On an issue where words are carefully parsed, this is a noticeable
shift from 'denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula' which was the norm
in the Obama years," Ben Rhodes, who served as Deputy National Security
Advisor under former President Barack Obama, said on Twitter.
[to top of second column]
|
A child plays with old weapons displayed for visitors at the Korean
War Memorial Museum in Seoul August 11, 2011. REUTERS/Truth Leem
'LUNATIC THEORY'
Implications of unilateral denuclearisation are "a nonstarter for
Pyongyang and is unlikely to jumpstart any negotiations," said Vipin
Narang, a nuclear affairs expert at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology in the United States.
"The formulation 'denuclearisation of North Korea' implies
unilateral obligations on North Korea - something it has never
agreed to, and neither have we," he said.
In a statement on Thursday, a senior North Korean diplomat blasted
the Biden administration's talk of complete denuclearisation as a
"lunatic theory" that needed to be dropped before talks could
resume.
Conflicting or vague views of what denuclearisation means have
complicated negotiations that have largely been stalled since 2019.
In 2018, North Korea defined "denuclearisation of the Korean
Peninsula" as "removing all elements of nuclear threats from the
areas of both the north and the south of Korea and also from
surrounding areas from where the Korean peninsula is targeted."
That has been interpreted as the United States withdrawing its
troops from South Korea and ending its "nuclear umbrella" security
alliance with Seoul, among other conditions.
Washington, meanwhile, has insisted on complete, verifiable, and
irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapons and the
facilities needed to build them. The United States has never
publicly said it would reduce its own military presence in return,
and regularly stresses its commitment to defending South Korea.
Duyeon Kim, with the U.S.-based Center for a New American Security,
said the wording around denuclearisation is only a big deal if
Pyongyang makes it an issue.
"It would be silly and a missed opportunity for Pyongyang if
phraseology on denuclearisation in American public comments and
statements became deal breakers before any meaningful talks even
take place with the Biden administration," she said.
(Reporting by Josh Smith; Additional reporting by Hyonhee Shin;
Editing by Lincoln Feast.)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |