|
Climate Action 100+, whose 575 members manage $54 trillion in
assets, was set up in 2017 to engage with the companies
responsible for the bulk of planet-heating emissions to
encourage them to cut them and strengthen climate disclosures.
If added together and treated as a country, the companies -
including oil majors like Exxon, Saudi Aramco and BP as well as
Unilever - would be the third biggest emitter behind the United
States and China, the group said.
Releasing its first 'Climate Action 100+ Net-Zero Company
Benchmark', the group uses a traffic-light system to show how
each of the 159 companies is currently performing on a variety
of indicators and metrics.
None of the companies have fully disclosed how they will achieve
their goals to become a net zero business by 2050 or sooner, the
assessment shows, including setting short- and medium-term
targets.
Irked by the slow pace of change at some companies, leading
investors have thrown their weight behind shareholder
resolutions in the current season for annual general meetings
demanding better information on company plans.
"The Climate Action 100+ Net Zero Company Benchmark shows there
is an urgent need for greater corporate action and higher
ambition in accelerating the net zero economy and ensuring a
safe and viable future," said Mindy Lubber, president of CA100+
who also runs sustainability organisation Ceres.
REDUCTION TARGETS
Although 83 of the companies assessed have announced an aim of
achieving net-zero by 2050, around half of these commitments do
not encompass the full scope of their emissions.
While 107 companies had set medium-term targets, only 20 met all
the assessment criteria; of the 75 to set short-term targets,
only eight did so.
Only six companies had committed to aligning their capital
expenditure with their long-term reduction targets, and none
have so far pledged to align them with the Paris Agreement goal
of limiting the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
When scenario planning for the risks and opportunities posed by
climate change, just 10% of the companies include the 1.5
degrees scenario across the whole of their operations.
Although 139 companies consider climate change at board level,
only a third of those assessed explicitly link executive pay to
their targets for reducing emissions.
The assessment, based on companies' public disclosures and any
additional information they provided before Jan. 22, will form
the base line for future engagement with them, CA100+ said.
"This is a vitally important piece of work. We will be using it
not only to inform our engagement but also our proxy voting,
because for us, ultimately, we have to be able to hold boards
accountable," said Anne Simpson, managing investment director of
board governance and sustainability at the California Public
Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).
Graphic: Biggest emitters far from aligning with climate goals -
https://graphics.reuters.com/CLIMATE-CHANGE/INVESTORS/
yxmvjwjgrpr/chart.png
(Reporting by Simon Jessop; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|
