| 
		Bill to end qualified immunity advances out of committee
		 Send a link to a friend 
		[March 27, 2021] 
		By TIM KIRSININKASCapitol News Illinois
 tkirsininkas@capitolnewsillinois.com
 
 
  SPRINGFIELD – A measure to end qualified immunity as a legal defense for 
		law enforcement officers advanced out of the House Restorative Justice 
		Committee at a Thursday hearing. 
 House Bill 1727, introduced by Rep. Curtis Tarver, D-Chicago, would 
		create the Bad Apples in Law Enforcement Accountability Act. It aims to 
		remove the court doctrine of qualified immunity for officers, opening 
		them up to civil litigation if they participate in the “deprivation of 
		any individual rights” guaranteed in the Illinois Constitution. The 
		liability is created even for officers who fail to intervene if such a 
		deprivation is otherwise occurring.
 
		
		 
		
 The bill would also require local municipalities to disclose information 
		about settlements with law enforcement officers.
 
 Tarver and proponents of the legislation said the concept of qualified 
		immunity emboldens some officers to make reckless decisions that could 
		cost lives, as in the case of George Floyd’s killing in Minneapolis last 
		year.
 
 “Qualified immunity is one defense in a host of defenses that law 
		enforcement has,” Tarver said. “Someone putting their knee on someone’s 
		neck for nine minutes when they’ve already surrendered, that’s not a 
		split-second decision.”
 
 Peter Hanna from ACLU of Illinois told the committee on Thursday that 
		the legislation is an effort to hold “bad apples” in police ranks 
		accountable for their actions.
 
 “We can no longer just accept the presence of bad apples in law 
		enforcement as an inevitable truth,” Hanna said. “No reform, no matter 
		how well intentioned, can be effective until we add real police 
		accountability.”
 
 Opponents argued the bill would contribute to ongoing problems with 
		retaining and recruiting police officers who have cited recent changes 
		to state law as reasons to not enter the law enforcement field in 
		Illinois.
 
 “We have the membership rolls, we see the outcome, we know we're losing 
		membership,” said Andrew Bodewes of the Illinois Fraternal Order of 
		Police. “We're concerned that a change like this would further 
		complicate that.”
 
 “We don't believe that changes in qualified immunity are the correct 
		tool to just solve the problem. Obviously we always want to talk about 
		bettering law enforcement, (we) always want to have that conversation, 
		but we just don't see the value of using this tool,” Bodewes added.
 
		 
		Jim Kaitschuk of the Illinois Sheriffs Association told the committee 
		the legislation could also result in complicating an officer’s 
		decision-making process when arriving on a scene.
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            “The bill goes a lot further than just eliminating qualified 
			immunity,” Kaitschuk said. “I have a duty to intervene, at the same 
			time, if I do intervene and I didn't act and based on the 
			information that I have in front of me, I'm going to be held liable 
			if somebody else made a mistake or if I detain someone.”
 Tarver argued that if law enforcement officers leave the field as a 
			result of the proposed legislation, they did not belong in the field 
			to begin with.
 
 “If this leads to less police officers who are attracted to law 
			enforcement because they know that they can demonize people and 
			brutalize people, then I'm all for it,” Tarver said. “If this leads 
			to attracting the right people, I'm all for it as well.”
 
            Tarver said the legislation is not intended to target police 
			officers unfairly, but rather is designed to hold all officers to a 
			higher standard.
 “It's very simple, like everybody else in the private sector, 
			control your employees, hire the best and the brightest, train them, 
			provide the resources,” Tarver said. “If municipalities are 
			concerned, all they have to do is follow that very basic guideline 
			and I think we’d all be in better shape.”
 
 Opponents on the committee, including Reps. Tony McCombie, 
			R-Savanna, and Patrick Windhorst, R-Metropolis, argued the bill goes 
			too far to target a legal defense that is rarely used in Illinois.
 
 Windhorst said that a decertification bill that was signed into law 
			earlier this year serves as a sufficient punishment to “bad apples” 
			in law enforcement, and that the bill calls for a commission to 
			study the effects of qualified immunity.
 
 
            
			 
			“We passed an expanded decertification law that's now going to be 
			law, where we actually say, ‘bad apple? You're no longer a police 
			officer. You violated somebody's constitutional rights? You're no 
			longer a police officer. You broke the law? You're no longer a 
			police officer.’ That is the effective way to address the bad 
			apples,” Windhorst said.
 
 McCombie echoed concerns about officers leaving the field.
 
 “This bill is going to have many unintended and intended 
			consequences that I feel are going to put our very own public safety 
			at risk,” McCombie said.
 
 Representatives from ACLU of Illinois called the bill’s passage a 
			“significant” response to “egregious police misconduct.”
 
 “For too long, special protections like qualified immunity create an 
			almost insurmountable barrier to justice for people whose 
			constitutional rights have been violated by police,” Khadine 
			Bennett, ACLU Illinois director of advocacy and intergovernmental 
			affairs, said in a statement.
 
 “HB 1727 changes that and provides the people of this state a chance 
			to hold bad police officers accountable when they violate someone’s 
			constitutional rights,” Bennett added.
 
 The bill passed committee on a 4-2 partisan roll call, with support 
			from only Democrats.
 
 Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 
			news service covering state government and distributed to more than 
			400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois 
			Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
 |