Bill to end qualified immunity advances out of committee
Send a link to a friend
[March 27, 2021]
By TIM KIRSININKAS
Capitol News Illinois
tkirsininkas@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – A measure to end qualified immunity as a legal defense for
law enforcement officers advanced out of the House Restorative Justice
Committee at a Thursday hearing.
House Bill 1727, introduced by Rep. Curtis Tarver, D-Chicago, would
create the Bad Apples in Law Enforcement Accountability Act. It aims to
remove the court doctrine of qualified immunity for officers, opening
them up to civil litigation if they participate in the “deprivation of
any individual rights” guaranteed in the Illinois Constitution. The
liability is created even for officers who fail to intervene if such a
deprivation is otherwise occurring.
The bill would also require local municipalities to disclose information
about settlements with law enforcement officers.
Tarver and proponents of the legislation said the concept of qualified
immunity emboldens some officers to make reckless decisions that could
cost lives, as in the case of George Floyd’s killing in Minneapolis last
year.
“Qualified immunity is one defense in a host of defenses that law
enforcement has,” Tarver said. “Someone putting their knee on someone’s
neck for nine minutes when they’ve already surrendered, that’s not a
split-second decision.”
Peter Hanna from ACLU of Illinois told the committee on Thursday that
the legislation is an effort to hold “bad apples” in police ranks
accountable for their actions.
“We can no longer just accept the presence of bad apples in law
enforcement as an inevitable truth,” Hanna said. “No reform, no matter
how well intentioned, can be effective until we add real police
accountability.”
Opponents argued the bill would contribute to ongoing problems with
retaining and recruiting police officers who have cited recent changes
to state law as reasons to not enter the law enforcement field in
Illinois.
“We have the membership rolls, we see the outcome, we know we're losing
membership,” said Andrew Bodewes of the Illinois Fraternal Order of
Police. “We're concerned that a change like this would further
complicate that.”
“We don't believe that changes in qualified immunity are the correct
tool to just solve the problem. Obviously we always want to talk about
bettering law enforcement, (we) always want to have that conversation,
but we just don't see the value of using this tool,” Bodewes added.
Jim Kaitschuk of the Illinois Sheriffs Association told the committee
the legislation could also result in complicating an officer’s
decision-making process when arriving on a scene.
[to top of second column]
|
“The bill goes a lot further than just eliminating qualified
immunity,” Kaitschuk said. “I have a duty to intervene, at the same
time, if I do intervene and I didn't act and based on the
information that I have in front of me, I'm going to be held liable
if somebody else made a mistake or if I detain someone.”
Tarver argued that if law enforcement officers leave the field as a
result of the proposed legislation, they did not belong in the field
to begin with.
“If this leads to less police officers who are attracted to law
enforcement because they know that they can demonize people and
brutalize people, then I'm all for it,” Tarver said. “If this leads
to attracting the right people, I'm all for it as well.”
Tarver said the legislation is not intended to target police
officers unfairly, but rather is designed to hold all officers to a
higher standard.
“It's very simple, like everybody else in the private sector,
control your employees, hire the best and the brightest, train them,
provide the resources,” Tarver said. “If municipalities are
concerned, all they have to do is follow that very basic guideline
and I think we’d all be in better shape.”
Opponents on the committee, including Reps. Tony McCombie,
R-Savanna, and Patrick Windhorst, R-Metropolis, argued the bill goes
too far to target a legal defense that is rarely used in Illinois.
Windhorst said that a decertification bill that was signed into law
earlier this year serves as a sufficient punishment to “bad apples”
in law enforcement, and that the bill calls for a commission to
study the effects of qualified immunity.
“We passed an expanded decertification law that's now going to be
law, where we actually say, ‘bad apple? You're no longer a police
officer. You violated somebody's constitutional rights? You're no
longer a police officer. You broke the law? You're no longer a
police officer.’ That is the effective way to address the bad
apples,” Windhorst said.
McCombie echoed concerns about officers leaving the field.
“This bill is going to have many unintended and intended
consequences that I feel are going to put our very own public safety
at risk,” McCombie said.
Representatives from ACLU of Illinois called the bill’s passage a
“significant” response to “egregious police misconduct.”
“For too long, special protections like qualified immunity create an
almost insurmountable barrier to justice for people whose
constitutional rights have been violated by police,” Khadine
Bennett, ACLU Illinois director of advocacy and intergovernmental
affairs, said in a statement.
“HB 1727 changes that and provides the people of this state a chance
to hold bad police officers accountable when they violate someone’s
constitutional rights,” Bennett added.
The bill passed committee on a 4-2 partisan roll call, with support
from only Democrats.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |