| 
		Illinois Chamber of Commerce seeks changes to Biometric Information 
		Privacy Act
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 29, 2021] 
		By Elyse Kelly 
		(The Center Square) – The Biometric 
		Information Privacy Act of 2008, known as BIPA, was developed to protect 
		individual privacy in the Internet Age, but some business groups say the 
		law is not working, prompting an effort to revamp it.
 Since 2019, 1,076 lawsuits citing BIPA have been filed in Illinois, 
		Kearicher said, against companies like the Salvation Army and St. 
		Anthony’s Hospital, resulting from timekeeping systems that use a 
		fingerprint scan.
 
		 
		
 Proponents of Bill 559 want some major changes that would protect 
		businesses more.
 
 Clark Kaericher, Illinois Chamber of Commerce vice president, says 
		current BIPA law is from the dinosaur era of tech laws.
 
		“It was passed two months after the introduction of iPhone 1 and two 
		full years before the introduction of the iPad – things that we 
		certainly now can’t remember living without,” he said.
 BIPA lay mainly dormant until a state Supreme Court ruling in 2019 which 
		said a plaintiff in a BIPA case didn’t need to prove harm to get 
		damages. This violates a touchstone of American jurisprudence, according 
		to Kaericher.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            “They use logic equivalent to the ‘you have black ice on your 
			parking lot or on your driveway at your house and I could’ve fallen 
			– I didn’t fall, but I could’ve fallen, and therefore I’m going to 
			sue you,’” he said. 
            This ruling prompted the flurry of lawsuits against Illinois 
			businesses. Other businesses, including Facebook, also got hit with 
			lawsuits.
 As it stands, this bill discourages businesses and new tech 
			development, Kaericher said.
 
 “There’s a real innovation stifling aspect to our biometrics laws,” 
			he said. “Companies don’t want to roll out products here in Illinois 
			because they’re scared of BIPA.”
 
 One of the key points that Bill 559 will change is it will require 
			plaintiffs to have suffered actual harm in order to recover damages.
 
 “And that in cases of negligence or where companies didn’t know any 
			better, they have a right to cure, or in layman’s terms, the ability 
			to fix the violation within 30 days,” Kaericher said.
 
            
			 
			Opponents of the revamp claim it will basically make the old law 
			useless, and many states look to Illinois’ BIPA law as a model.
 
 Kaericher said many states do look at Illinois’ BIPA laws as a 
			potential blueprint, but after seeing it up close they “run in 
			horror.”
 |