In
a decision on Monday night, U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter in
Manhattan said Clyde Waite, the plaintiff leading the proposed
class action, failed to identify any statements by Nokia that
were false or misleading when they were made.
He also said it was not plausible that Nokia's statements would
have misled reasonable investors, given the company's "numerous
and continuous disclosures regarding the Alcatel integration and
5G progress."
Carter dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot
be filed again.
Waite's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for
comment outside market hours. Lawyers for Nokia and former Chief
Executive Rajeev Suri, who was also a defendant, did not
immediately respond to similar requests.
The litigation began after Nokia said in March 2019 it had
alerted regulators to "compliance issues" at Alcatel-Lucent,
which it bought in 2016 in a transaction originally valued at
15.6 billion euros, though any penalties should be immaterial.
Then in October 2019, Nokia slashed its profit outlook and
suspended its dividend, citing the need to spend more money amid
a "competitive intensity" for 5G market share.
The price of Nokia's American depositary receipts fell about 6%
immediately after the March disclosures, and nearly 24% after
the October disclosures.
Earlier this month, Nokia said it expects to shed about 10,000
jobs from its roughly 90,000-employee workforce within two
years, as new Chief Executive Pekka Lundmark tries to boost
margins and catch up with rivals in 5G.
Nokia's rivals include Sweden's Ericsson and China's Huawei
Technologies.
The case is In re Nokia Corporation Securities Litigation, U.S.
District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 19-03509.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Sonya
Hepinstall)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|