Illinois auto dealers sue Jesse White’s office, electric vehicle
companies
Send a link to a friend
[March 30, 2021]
By PETER HANCOCK
Capitol News Illinois
phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Automobile
Dealers Association has filed a lawsuit against Illinois Secretary of
State Jesse White’s office, alleging that White is allowing unlicensed,
unregulated dealers to operate in Illinois, in violation of state law.
At issue in the case is whether automobile manufacturers should be
allowed to own and operate their own dealerships rather than contracting
with independent dealership franchises, which has been the case in
Illinois and most other states for decades.
But in recent years, there has been a growing trend of “vertical
integration” within the industry, especially within the electric car
industry where manufacturers like Tesla and others have insisted that
they have a right to sell their own products directly to customers.
“We have no choice but to file this lawsuit, both to protect consumers
as well as the hundreds of franchised dealers across the state who
contribute to the local economy,” IADA president Pete Sander said in a
statement. “We warned the Secretary of State’s office that consumers
will be the losers if it does not enforce the laws it is required to
enforce.”
Specifically, the lawsuit challenges the operations of two electric
vehicle manufacturers, Rivian and Lucid Motors, which the lawsuit says
are both taking online orders for sales directly to the public in
Illinois.
In their complaint, filed in Cook County Circuit Court, IADA, along with
several local dealer associations and numerous individual auto dealers,
argue that under a decades-old Illinois law, no one is allowed to engage
in the business of selling new vehicles unless they are a licensed
dealer, and the only way to become a licensed dealer is to have a
contract with a manufacturer establishing a franchise agreement.
The plaintiffs argue that such laws protect consumers because dealers
maintain service centers that can perform required recall work and they
maintain an inventory of replacement parts and provide service work.
Plaintiffs also argue that dealers provide price competition within
local markets and that as established businesses in their communities,
they are a source of local jobs and tax revenue.
Nontraditional manufacturers like Tesla, Rivian and Lucid have come onto
the market using a different business model in which they sell directly
to consumers over the internet, although Tesla does operate dealerships
as well.
According to the complaint, White’s office, which is responsible for
administering the state’s vehicle laws, first granted Tesla permission
to sell new vehicles directly to consumers in 2009. The office also
granted a dealership license to Tesla founder and president Elon Musk,
even though Musk owned more than 1 percent of the shares in the
manufacturing company, Tesla Motors.
[to top of second column]
|
Automobile dealers in Illinois are suing the
secretary of state and a pair of electric vehicle companies,
including Lucid Motors, challenging the companies' ability to sell
their vehicles online, rather than through a dealership, as pictured
in this screenshot. (Credit: Screenshot of lucidmotors.com)
IADA began registering its objections with White’s office in 2012,
and a lengthy chain of correspondence ensued between IADA, White’s
office and Tesla Motors. By January 2017, White’s office informed
Tesla that it would not issue any more dealership licenses or renew
any existing ones until the company came into compliance with state
laws.
Tesla, however, filed for an administrative review on that decision,
and in May 2019, all the parties entered into an administrative
consent order that limited Tesla to no more than 13 dealerships in
the state at any one time.
While all that was happening, two new manufacturers came onto the
scene – Rivian, which specializes in electric pickup trucks and has
opened a manufacturing plant in the Bloomington-Normal area; and
Lucid Motors, which has opened a showroom in Oak Brook and whose
website indicates it is now accepting online orders for vehicles.
Both companies market their vehicles directly to consumers online.
In 2020, White’s office asked for an informal legal opinion from
Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul’s office, asking whether the
state’s Motor Vehicle Franchise Act prohibits manufacturers from
selling directly to consumers or whether they had to sell through
franchise dealerships.
In July of that year, Raoul’s office responded, saying the act does
not specifically require newly established manufacturers to sell
vehicles through franchises, nor does it prohibit them from selling
online directly to customers.
But IADA and the other plaintiffs challenged that conclusion,
arguing that a separate law, the Illinois Vehicle Code, requires
that new vehicles be sold through licensed dealerships, and the only
way to become a licensed dealer is through a franchise contract.
The plaintiffs are seeking an order directing White’s office to
enforce the state’s Vehicle Code and stop Rivian, Lucid and other
car dealerships from directly selling vehicles in-state. They also
are seeking an injunction against Rivian and Lucid to prevent the
ongoing sale of vehicles to Illinoisans until a decision is reached.
“We welcome new manufacturers to Illinois, especially those who are
building innovative vehicles,” David Sloan, president of the Chicago
Automobile Trade Association, said in a statement. “Our franchised
members already sell dozens of electric and hybrid vehicles. We ask
that manufacturers sell them in Illinois according to state law.
We’re not demanding they cease operations in the state, just that
they franchise a dealer.”
A spokesman for Secretary White’s office declined to comment on the
case Monday, saying his office had not yet been officially served
with the lawsuit.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |