U.S. says Giuliani not above the law, cannot block review of phones
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2021]
By Jonathan Stempel and Karen Freifeld
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. prosecutors urged
a federal judge to allow a review of evidence seized from Rudolph
Giuliani's phones, saying the former New York City mayor was not above
the law and could not block the review because he had been Donald
Trump's lawyer.
The recommendation came in a Thursday night court filing, three days
after Giuliani opposed the government's request for a "special master"
to review records seized from 18 electronic devices, including
cellphones and computers, taken during April 28 raids on his home and
office.
Prosecutors have been examining Giuliani's dealings in Ukraine,
including whether he violated lobbying laws by acting as an unregistered
foreign agent while working for then-U.S. President Trump.
Giuliani's lawyers have demanded that prosecutors turn over documents
showing what basis they had to obtain warrants to conduct the raids.
They have also said the evidence should have been sought by subpoena,
allowing Giuliani to review the devices first, including for
attorney-client privilege issues.
But prosecutors said Giuliani was not "above the law or immune to
criminal investigation" simply because he was a lawyer, and not entitled
to decide what they get to see.
"Giuliani argues that, quite unlike other subjects of criminal
investigations, he is entitled to review the affidavits supporting the
warrants, which would effectively give him the extraordinary benefit of
knowing the government's evidence before even being charged with a
crime," prosecutors said.
Issuance of a warrant meant a judge found probable cause to believe the
seized devices might contain evidence of crimes.
[to top of second column]
|
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, then-personal attorney to
U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
U.S., November 7, 2020. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
Arthur Aidala, a lawyer for Giuliani, on Friday said
a subpoena would have been preferable.
"Any lawyer has an attorney-client privilege that he must protect on
behalf of his clients," he said. "That privilege is doubly enhanced
when the lawyer's client is the President of the United States who
also enjoys executive privilege."
Aidala and Robert Costello, another lawyer for Giuliani, rejected
the idea that their client was or considered himself above the law.
U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken in Manhattan will decide whether
Giuliani can review the seized materials before prosecutors can, and
whether a special master is appropriate.
Giuliani began representing Trump, a Republican, in April 2018 in
connection with then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe into
Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Giuliani also sought prior to the 2020 U.S. election to dig up dirt
concerning Ukraine and Democrat Joe Biden, then running for the
White House and now U.S. president.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Karen Freifeld in New York;
editing by Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |