Yet the U.S. and the world are in the midst of a great “energy
transition” to fight climate change – one intended as a complete transformation
of our energy sector, from production to transportation to utilization. We are
told that this journey will help us move away from oil, coal, and natural gas to
a world dominated by windmills, solar panels and electric cars.
This will surely be a herculean challenge: oil, coal and gas
meet over 80% of America’s current energy needs, while wind and solar supply
just 4%. The U.S. has over 270 million cars that run on oil; it has just 2
million that use electricity.
The hard truth: an energy system powered by these “green” technologies differs
enormously from one fueled by traditional hydrocarbon resources. It goes
routinely unmentioned, for instance, that the energy transition will require an
immense mining revolution for the raw materials needed to manufacture
green-energy technologies.
Renewables and electric cars are far more mineral-intensive than their
conventional counterparts – so much so that many green-energy advocates have
been forced to contradict their own positions because they opposed large-scale
mining and mineral extraction.
The IEA’s new report, “The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy
Transitions,” explains all this quite clearly. The IEA notes that a typical
electric car requires six times the mineral inputs of a conventional car, and an
onshore wind plant requires nine times more mineral resources than a natural
gas-fired power plant. Demand for a long list of minerals is already starting to
surge as clean-energy transitions gain momentum.
The types of minerals required vary by technology. In terms of improving
performance, longevity, and energy density, lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese,
and graphite are key to the batteries used in electric cars and the
backup-storage systems needed to compensate for the natural intermittency of
wind and solar power. The 17 listed rare-earth elements are integral for
permanent magnets used in wind turbines and electric car motors. More quietly
but just as importantly, these critical materials are also engrained in the
technologies that enable the U.S. national security apparatus.
Since 2010, the average amount of minerals needed for a new unit of power
generation capacity has increased by 50% – and that’s just to bring wind and
solar to a 10% share of the world’s electricity (and 4% of all energy).
The changes needed for the world to meet net-zero carbon by 2050 are simply
staggering. Per the IEA:
By 2030, the world must add more than 1,000 gigawatts of wind and solar power
capacity annually – only slightly less than the entire electric power system in
the U.S. uses today.
Electric passenger cars must reach 60% of new sales by 2030, while half of heavy
trucks purchased by 2035 must be electrical.
Indeed, a global energy transition like the one President Joe Biden insists upon
will send the need for critical materials skyrocketing by 2040:
The U.S. is setting itself up for major geopolitical risk: according to the
Centre for Strategic and International Studies, China provides more than 85% of
the world’s rare-earths and holds 67% of the global supply of scarce metals and
minerals. The U.S. itself imports some 80% of its rare-earths from China.
[ to
top of second column] |
President Joe Biden speaks during an event on the American Jobs Plan
in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus, Wednesday,
April 7, 2021, in Washington.
Evan Vucci | AP
China also controls the supply chains, utilizing
its widening Belt and Road Initiative that now encompasses 45
countries (more aptly termed “partners”). We have already seen the
devastation that such Chinese supply dominance can bring. If we
don’t start thinking more strategically, we are on a path toward
cartel dependence. Given the urgency of reducing greenhouse gas
emissions, this is a possibility that we simply cannot afford.
America’s energy transition must therefore center on a domestic
mining revolution. Since 2008, the shale revolution
has demonstrated how quickly we can transform energy markets through
advanced technologies. As RealClear showed back in October,
expanding our mining capabilities enjoys bipartisan support. The
U.S. has far more stringent environmental regulations and standards
for ethically responsible mining than our competitors. Congo, for
example, the world’s main supplier of the cobalt critical for
electric cars, uses child labor. China uses forced labor for the
production of solar panels.
Thus, a U.S. mining and manufacturing revolution for renewables and
electric cars should be strongly promoted by private firms like
Blackrock, and by foundations and NGOs that claim to care so much
about environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG).
President Biden has linked his American Jobs Plan to green energy,
but his vision won’t materialize without the necessary raw
materials. It has been projected that the U.S. has access to $6
trillion to $7 trillion in mineral resources, but we need a more
streamlined permitting process.
For example, large lithium resources have been identified in
Arkansas, California, Nevada, North Carolina, and Utah. The IEA
wants the U.S. to start massive domestic development now: today’s
mineral supply and investment plans fall far short of what’s needed
to transform the energy sector, raising the risk of delayed or more
expensive energy transitions. Higher costs will erode public
support. Renewables are already confronting input issues from
various angles.
Extracting the raw materials and manufacturing the technologies here
at home must become a non-negotiable pillar of America’s energy and
climate goals. It is a project that deserves the support of both
Democrats and Republicans. Jude Clemente is the
editor at RealClearEnergy.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |