Dems say court remap reflects population shifts, GOP calls it power grab
Send a link to a friend
[May 29, 2021]
By SARAH MANSUR
Capitol News Illinois
smansur@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD — Partisan outrage over new
proposed district lines for the Illinois Supreme Court was on full
display Friday in the Illinois General Assembly.
The House passed the court remap legislation by 72-45 vote. It passed
the Senate 41-18 shortly after that, leading Republicans to call for a
veto from Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker.
Legislative Republicans denounced Democrats for dropping the latest
version of the judicial map late Thursday night and scheduling new
redistricting committee hearings an hour before those committees were
held at 9:30 a.m. Friday. The second map is nearly identical to the
first judicial map draft released on Tuesday.
Democrats maintain that Illinois Supreme Court redistricting is needed
because those districts have remained unchanged since the early 1960s.
They claim that major population changes in the five judicial districts
justify a new Illinois Supreme Court map, in order to comply with the
state constitution's requirement that the four districts outside of Cook
County have “substantially equal population.”
“It’s been nearly 60 years,” said Rep. Curtis Tarver, D-Chicago, who
sponsored the court redistricting bill. “This is about the constitution.
That's it.”
Tarver, however, said he did not draw the maps, did not know who drew
the maps, and did not know how the lines were drawn.
Republicans said they believe the new map is motivated primarily by the
election loss of Democratic Justice Thomas Kilbride, who was not
retained by voters in the November 2020 election.
Kilbride’s failure to earn the 60 percent of the vote needed to gain
retention in the 3rd District is the first time in Illinois Supreme
Court history that a sitting justice lost a retention election.
During floor debate on the map Friday, Rep. Deanne Mazzochi, an Elmhurst
Republican, described the Democrats’ new judicial map as “the Democratic
Party's efforts to manipulate the Illinois Supreme Court, as they've
done in every other branch of government” in response to Kilbride’s
loss.
Rep. Ryan Spain, a Peoria Republican who is a member of the House
Redistricting Committee, echoed Mazzochi’s claims.
“In the state of Illinois, not only do we allow politicians to pick
their voters, but through this bill, we're going to let judges do it
too,” he said.
Currently, the court has a 4-3 Democratic majority. After Kilbride lost
his retention election, the justices appointed Democrat Robert Carter to
fill his seat.
The three Republican justices hail from the 2nd, 4th and 5th districts.
The new map redraws the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th districts, which each have
one elected justice. Three justices are elected from the 1st District,
which spans Cook County.
[to top of second column]
|
Rep. Curtis Tarver, D-Chicago, introduces a Supreme
Court redistricting bill Friday on the floor of the Illinois House.
He said he did not draw the district lines in the bill, did not know
who did, and did not know how they were drawn. (Credit:
Blueroomstream.com)
The proposed map extends the 4th District, which
currently runs across central Illinois from Kankakee County to the
Quad Cities, to absorb counties within the current 2nd District and
3rd District.
For example, the new 4th District would gain Peoria County and the
Quad Cities region, which are both currently in the 3rd District. It
would also acquire Winnebago County and DuPage County, which are
currently in the 2nd District.
The 5th District, which currently spans more than 30 counties
downstate, would gain Champaign County and Macon County, which were
previously within the 4th District.
The new map was drafted using American Community Survey data, as
well as election data, according to Tarver. ACS data is less precise
and detailed than the U.S. Census Bureau data, which is delayed
because of the pandemic.
Republicans also took issue with the Democrats’ claim that the new
proposed judicial map will not impact the appellate court justices
because the appellate courts share district boundaries with the
Illinois Supreme Court.
Rep. Patrick Windhorst, R-Metropolis, said he was concerned the new
map could affect the number of appellate court justices within a
certain district, and it could conflict with current law that sets
the number of appellate justices in a district.
Republicans said the lack of hearings and public feedback on the
Supreme Court remap was a serious flaw of the proposal as well.
Spain said he and his colleagues asked multiple times during
discussion of legislative maps if they would also be reviewing other
aspects of redistricting, including Supreme Court maps, but he was
never told that those maps would be considered.
“I really do think that transparency is important. I think that it
is valuable to receive public input on the decisions that we're
making here. We did not give the public any reasonable effort to get
engaged with this topic. And now here we are at the end of May,
holding a hearing at the 11th hour,” Spain said.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |