Exclusive: Chinese embassy lobbies U.S. business to oppose China bills -
sources
Send a link to a friend
[November 15, 2021] By
Michael Martina
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - China has been
pushing U.S. executives, companies and business groups in recent weeks
to fight against China-related bills in the U.S. Congress, four sources
familiar with the initiative told Reuters, in letters to and meetings
with a wide range of actors in the business community.
China's embassy in Washington had sent letters pressing executives to
urge members of Congress to alter or drop specific bills that seek to
enhance U.S. competitiveness, according to the sources and the text of a
letter sent by the embassy's economic and commercial office seen by
Reuters.
Chinese officials warned companies they would risk losing market share
or revenue in China if the legislation becomes law, according to the
text of the letter.
The sources said China's request also left some individuals who received
a letter concerned that they could be seen as violating the Foreign
Agents Registration Act (FARA) if they lobbied lawmakers on similar
issues in the future.
As a result, none of the sources wanted to be identified as having
received or seen the letter.
China's foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said in response to a
request for comment that certain bills distorted facts and were based on
"Cold War thinking." If passed, he said, they would harm bilateral
relations and cooperation between the two countries.
"China has always resolutely opposed this," he said at a daily briefing
in Beijing.
Sweeping U.S. legislation to boost competition with China and fund
much-needed semiconductor production, known as the U.S. Innovation and
Competition Act (USICA), passed the Senate with bipartisan support in
June. A related bill in the House of Representatives called the Eagle
Act, which is more strictly policy focused, has stalled as Congress has
been preoccupied with other domestic initiatives.
The language in the letters, which Reuters determined were sent
separately to a wide number of people, explicitly asks companies to
oppose USICA and the Eagle Act.
[to top of second column] |
The flags of the United States and China fly from a lamppost in the
Chinatown neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts, U.S., November 1,
2021. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo
'NEGATIVE BILLS'
Beijing sees the measures, which take a hard line toward China on human rights
and trade issues, as part of a U.S. effort to counter its growing economic and
geopolitical might.
"We sincerely hope you ... will play a positive role in urging members of
Congress to abandon the zero-sum mindset and ideological prejudice, stop touting
negative China-related bills, delete negative provisions, so as to create
favorable conditions for bilateral economic and trade cooperation before it is
too late," the Chinese embassy said in one letter sent in early November.
Reuters confirmed the shared language of the letter with the four sources.
"The result of those China-related bills with negative impacts will not be that
the interests of U.S. companies will be protected while those of Chinese
companies will suffer. It is only going to hurt everyone," it said.
"Promoting a China-free supply chain will inevitably result in a decline in
China's demand for U.S. products and American companies loss of market share and
revenue in China," it said.
Two of the sources said similar messages were conveyed in meetings with staff of
China's embassy.
"It's an outright ask by a foreign government," one of the sources said,
highlighting the implications for FARA, which requires persons acting on behalf
of a foreign power or political party to disclose those relations to the
Department of Justice.
A second source said the approach appeared geared at getting companies to delay
the legislative process rather than block the bills entirely.
(Reporting by Michael Martina; Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle and
Gabriel Crossley; Editing by Chris Sanders and Daniel Wallis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|