McKesson,
drug distributors face $95 billion opioid trial in Washington state
Send a link to a friend
[November 15, 2021]
By Nate Raymond
(Reuters) - A trial pitting Washington
state against McKesson Corp and two other drug distributors accused of
fueling the U.S. opioid epidemic is slated to kick off on Monday, after
the state's attorney general declined to join a $26 billion nationwide
settlement.
|
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson has accused McKesson,
Cardinal Health Inc and AmerisourceBergen Corp of creating a public
nuisance by failing to prevent the diversion of prescription pills
into illegal channels.
Washington is seeking $38.2 billion to fund treatment and other
programs and billions more in penalties and forfeited profits. The
distributors, who deny wrongdoing, say the state wants a "wildly
inflated recovery" of more than $95 billion.
More than 3,300 lawsuits by largely state and local governments have
been filed seeking to hold those and other companies responsible for
a drug abuse crisis the U.S. government says led to nearly 500,000
opioid overdose deaths over two decades.
Washington state would have been eligible for $527.5 million if it
had joined a proposed global deal, under which the distributors
would pay up to $21 billion
https://www.reuters.com/article/
us-usa-opioids-litigation-idTRNIKBN2ER25S and drugmaker Johnson &
Johnson would pay $5 billion to resolve the cases.
Ferguson, a Democrat, has criticized the settlement as "not nearly
good enough," saying the nearly $30 million on average the state and
its communities would receive annually was insufficient to address
the devastation caused by the epidemic.
The state became one of eight to not participate
https://www.reuters.com/article/
usa-opioids-litigation-idTRNIKBN2G00J1 in the distributors'
nationwide accord and opted to proceed to trial.
[to top of second column] |
"Washington families devastated
by the opioid epidemic deserve their day in
court," Ferguson said in a statement.
The companies deny wrongdoing, arguing that the
increase in pills was due to rising
prescriptions and other factors and that they
had systems in place to prevent drug diversion.
They argue that distributing regulated drugs
cannot support a public nuisance claim.
Plaintiffs in some of the other opioid cases have recently faced
setbacks pursuing nuisance claims.
Oklahoma's top court on Tuesday overturned a $465 million judgment
https://www.reuters.com/business/
oklahoma-court-overturns-465-million-opioid-award-against-johnson-johnson-2021-11-09
against J&J, and a California judge this month ruled in favor of
four drugmakers in a case brought by several large counties.
The distributors are awaiting a decision in a similar case in West
Virginia following a trial. Closing arguments are expected Monday in
Ohio in the first trial pharmacies have faced over the epidemic.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Noeleen Walder and
Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content |