The
origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 remains a
mystery and a major source of tension between China and the
United States.
A joint study by China and the World Health Organization (WHO)
this year all but ruled out the theory that COVID-19 originated
in a laboratory, saying that the most likely hypothesis was that
it infected humans naturally, probably via the wildlife trade.
A WHO-led team of experts spent four weeks in and around the
central city of Wuhan with Chinese scientists and said in a
joint report in March that the SARS-CoV-2 virus had probably
been transmitted from bats to humans through another animal but
that further research was needed.
The accountant, who was widely thought to be the first person
with COVID-19, reported that his first symptoms appeared on Dec.
16, several days later than initially known, Michael Worobey,
head of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of
Arizona, said in the study published in the journal Science on
Thursday.
The confusion was caused by a dental problem he had on Dec. 8.
"His symptom onset came after multiple cases in workers at
Huanan Market, making a female seafood vendor there the earliest
known case, with illness onset 11 December," the study said.
It said most early symptomatic cases were linked to the market,
specifically to the western section where raccoon dogs were
caged, and it provided strong evidence of a live-animal market
origin of the pandemic.
The WHO proposed last month a new expert panel to investigate
the source of the coronavirus.
(Reporting by Miyoung Kim; Editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|