| 
 At the heart of the ongoing hot debate over school choice is 
the question of how involved government should be in K-12 education. The data is 
clear that private schools provide a superior education to that of 
government-run schools. Education scholar James Tooley makes that case in 
"Really Good Schools: Global Lessons for High-Caliber, Low-Cost Education." He 
argues that “reducing the involvement of government in education can (1) reduce 
the size of government overall and hence the potential for corruption; and (2) 
reduce the potential for governments to use education as a means of domination, 
coercion, oppression, and patronage.” 
Corrupt Government Control
 The corrupting power of government is an issue too seldomly discussed in the 
context of public education. The problem is this: A corrupt government will use 
its control of the education of its future adult citizens for its own political 
ends at the expense of the best interests of its people. Authoritarian or 
totalitarian countries come to mind – e.g., the Soviet Union or China. But it 
can occur in a democracy as well – where government power over schools allows 
them to control the content of the curriculum and thereby manipulate the beliefs 
of its future electorate. Tragically, America’s traditional public schools are 
increasingly moving in this direction – teachers unions are working hand-in-hand 
with Democrat policymakers to use their unbridled power over schools to push 
radical agendas in classrooms, grooming children for left-wing loyalties.
 
 
 
At the core of this corruption is the intent to deprive the children of our 
nation of the education needed to develop critical thinking skills and the 
ability to evaluate facts and draw their own conclusions. Polarizing political 
agendas take priority over robust academic instruction. In essence, public 
schools have replaced teaching students how to think with teaching students what 
to think. As Tooley explains, “Those with influence and power over education 
have interests different from ‘the public good.’” Quickly vanishing are the days 
of civil discourse, balanced intellectual debate, and free speech – and not just 
at higher education institutions but on K-12 campuses as well.
 
to top of second column] | 
 
The corruption especially plays out in how U.S. history is presented. The 1619 
Project’s cynical and counter-factual narrative that slavery, rather than 
freedom, was the central motivating principle of the American Founding is being 
swiftly implemented in school curriculums. Anti-American ideologies are 
promoted, teaching children to have contempt for our nation and even its 
principles of liberty and justice. Based on doctrines of Critical Race Theory, 
students are labeled and divided into groups as oppressors and oppressed, not 
based on their actions and attitudes, but chiefly on their skin color. Academic 
standards are removed in the name of promoting a redefined “equity,” which 
replaces equal opportunity with demands for equal outcomes. Diversity and 
inclusion no longer mean respecting individuals and treating people fairly but 
stripping the rights and protections from the vast majority to cater to the 
demands for special privileges for select groups.
 Education Emancipation
 
 Look at history and even our present-day world, and a prevalent theme is that 
government control both stifles education and suppresses freedom. The remedy, as 
Tooley terms it, is education emancipation, with free-market education replacing 
government control of schools. And this free-market approach returns control to 
where it belongs – parents.
 
 As our public schools continue to teach radical ideologies while failing to 
educate over 70% of students with basic academic competencies, the urgency for 
education emancipation is dire. Private education is education by the people, 
for the people. We need that now more than ever.
 
Keri D. Ingraham is a Fellow at Discovery Institute and Director of the 
Institute’s American Center for Transforming Education. This article is part two 
of a three-part series. Part Three will propose a path forward through the 
development of low-cost private schools by education entrepreneurs. 
 |