Trial of 47 Hong Kong democracy activists charged with conspiracy to
commit subversion adjourned till March
Send a link to a friend
[November 29, 2021]
By Jessie Pang and James Pomfret
HONG KONG (Reuters) - A closely monitored
national security trial involving 47 Hong Kong democracy campaigners
charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, most of whom have been in
custody since March, has been adjourned till March next year, a judge
ruled on Monday.
Magistrate Peter Law adjourned the next hearing till March 4, after
making directions for the translation of nearly 10,000 pages of
documentary evidence by year end. Hong Kong laws bar media from
publishing most details of pre-trial proceedings.
The 47, who include opposition politicians, are among more than 150
people arrested under a national security law that Beijing imposed on
the former British colony last year that critics say erodes the freedoms
promised when it returned to Chinese rule in 1997.
Chinese and Hong Kong officials deny the charge and say the law has
returned order to Hong Kong which was hit by months of sometimes violent
pro-democracy, anti-China protests in 2019.
The 47, of whom only 14 have been released on bail, were arrested on
charges of participating in an unofficial, non-binding and independently
organised primary vote last year to select candidates for a
since-postponed city election, which authorities say was a "vicious
plot" to subvert the government.
Law extended bail for all 14 until the next hearing.
Diplomats and rights groups are closely watching the case amid mounting
concerns over Hong Kong's judicial independence, which is seen as one of
the pillars of its financial success.
[to top of second column]
|
Sze Tak-Loy, one of the 47 pro-democracy activists charged with
conspiracy to commit subversion under the national security law,
arrives at West Kowloon Magistrates' Courts building to take part in
a hearing, in Hong Kong, China November 29, 2021. REUTERS/Lam Yik
Authorities have repeatedly said the judiciary is
independent and that it is upholding the rule of law. They have also
said prosecutions are independent, based on evidence and had no
relation with the background or profession of the suspects.
Bail hearings in March for the 47 went on for four days and dragged
late into the night. Several of the defendants became ill and most
of their appeals for bail have been denied.
The security law sets a high threshold for defendants seeking bail
to demonstrate they would not break the law, a departure from common
law practice, which puts the onus on prosecutors to make their case
for detention.
Reasons for denying bail included unanswered emails from the U.S.
Consulate and WhatsApp messages with foreign journalists, which were
taken as proof there was a risk that defendants could endanger
national security if released on bail.
The protracted hearings and the reasons for rejecting bail have
stunned diplomats and rights groups, who see it as a dramatic
display of the city's authoritarian turn.
(Writing by Marius Zaharia; Editing by Nick Macfie)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |