Op-Ed: Why is America’s mail carrier
cashing checks?
[The Center Square] Ross Marchand |
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
It’s been a rough couple
of months for America’s mail carrier. The public is understandably
frustrated about slowing mail and rising stamp prices. Meanwhile, the
USPS lost $3 billion in the third quarter of fiscal year 2021 on top of
the more than $80 billion in net losses over the past 15 years. |
Instead of striving to improve basic mail services, though,
postal leadership seems distracted with odd forays into financial services.
Washington Post writer Jacob Bogage recently reported that the USPS “quietly
began offering paycheck-cashing services at several East Coast post offices last
month,” allowing consumers to trade their checks (worth up to $500) for Visa
gift cards. While the agency is quick to point out that this is just a pilot
program, the move to financial services makes little sense. A foray into postal
banking will only cause the USPS greater hardship without delivering for
low-income consumers.
It’s not all that surprising that the agency is testing out
financial offerings. Lawmakers such as Sen. Kristen Gillibrand have long called
for postal banking, claiming it would generate billions of dollars in revenue
while providing “financial security to millions of Americans in low-income and
rural communities.” Postal banking proponents such as Sen. Gillibrand believe
that the USPS can walk the tight rope of making enough money off of its
financial services to cover costs and then some, while providing a low-cost
option for households struggling with traditional financial institutions. But
it’s difficult to see how.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/969dc/969dc86630e50cc6c2108b51c74e3baa12c13f46" alt="" Consider the timely example of check-cashing. The government might claim they
are entering the check-cashing business to save low-income Americans from the
expense of converting funds in the private sector. This justification may have
made sense a few years ago, before banks started offering accounts with
low/minimal fees, zero required deposits, and easy check-cashing capabilities.
According to the Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund, there are now more than
100 bank and credit union accounts that meet the low-fee national standards
developed by the organization. Data from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation shows that the share of households without a bank account has
declined by about 20% from 2015 to 2019, and the 5.4% of unbanked households
have a variety of reasons for forgoing a bank account. But a majority of the
underbanked minority do not cite bank fees or minimum balance requirements as
the main reason for avoiding banks. It therefore seems unlikely that the USPS
setting up a low-cost check cashing service would solve any pressing problem in
the marketplace.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba16a/ba16a933709faa4982fd3f752dee865d9c02a670" alt=""
Of course, the agency could choose to emphasize
making money on financial services rather than helping low-income
Americans. Maybe the USPS believes that they could charge a bit less
than what Walmart charges for check-cashing, or about $4 for checks
up to $1,000. While it’s possible that the agency finds the “right”
price that covers business costs while still being competitive, the
USPS hardly has the best track-record in this sort of game.
Indications abound that the agency has been underpricing packages
for years via a wacky (and still mostly classified) cost attribution
formula. And the agency has a real problem getting a lid on
“controllable” costs such as equipment and fuel expenses. The costs
and risks of services such as check-cashing can be particularly
high, given the alarming – and increasing – volume of check fraud.
The amount of money involved in check scams nearly doubled from 2016
to 2018, and this type of fraud, “makes up 60 percent of all
attempted fraud against U.S. bank deposit accounts, according to a
survey released by the American Bankers Association.” The idea that
the USPS is somehow uniquely positioned to get a grip on this
problem in a cost-effective way is simply wishful thinking.
For all this speculation, though, we have remarkably little insight
as to why America’s mail carrier is trying to get into the
check-cashing business. Some answers would be nice, but the agency
isn’t exactly known for their forthrightness. Maybe postal
leadership can finally deliver some answers, along with actual
postal reform.
Ross Marchand is a senior fellow for the Taxpayers Protection
Alliance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89da/d89dad6e54dcf1e0e138700d388cea7371e1087e" alt=""
|