Progressives in U.S. Congress open to cutting cost, not scope, of Biden
bill
Send a link to a friend
[October 13, 2021]
By Richard Cowan, Susan Cornwell and Timothy Gardner
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Congress
progressives on Tuesday signaled a new willingness to shrink the cost,
but not the scope, of President Joe Biden's multi-trillion-dollar plan
to broaden social programs and tackle climate change, as they struggle
to reach a deal with party moderates.
Centrist Democrats have balked at the plan's initial $3.5 trillion price
tag. As a result, Biden faces a difficult balancing act in trying to
bring down the cost but not alienate progressives who also are essential
to passage.
Following a meeting earlier this month on Capitol Hill with his fellow
Democrats, Biden suggested the bill could cost around $2 trillion over
10 years.
"We are prepared to negotiate," Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent
who aligns with Democrats, told reporters on a Tuesday conference call.
He initially sought a $6 trillion bill.
But Sanders drew the line on one initiative -- including the cost of
elderly patients' vision, hearing and dental care covered under
Medicare. "This to me is not negotiable," he said.
Sanders added that time is overdue for centrist Senators Joe Manchin and
Kyrsten Sinema to tell the rest of the party what they want in the bill,
which is the centerpiece of President Biden's domestic agenda.
The head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Representative Pramila
Jayapal, complained that moderates had not articulated a clear position.
Among its provisions are expansions of healthcare for children and the
elderly and significant investments in clean technology for everything
from electric power generating plants to electric vehicles to reduce
carbon emissions responsible for climate change.
"We are waiting for just a couple of senators to tell us what their
proposal is," Jayapal said.
Over the past day, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave conflicting signals
as to whether Democrats would cut specific programs or try to adjust
timing to pare the bill's cost.
A spokesman said on Tuesday there were discussions of doing both.
Jayapal said that her nearly 100-member Progressive Caucus has made
clear that it supports maintaining all the bill's main priorities but
could go along with reducing the number of years they would be
effective.
[to top of second column]
|
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, (D-WA), speaks during a hearing of the House
Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative
Law on "Online Platforms and Market Power" in the Rayburn House
office building on Capitol Hill, in Washington, U.S., July 29, 2020.
Mandel Ngan/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo/File Photo
For example, she said the legislation could authorize
free community college, child care and other programs for less than
10 years. But she said that climate change measures were needed for
at least a decade.
Biden is due to travel to Glasgow in coming weeks for a United
Nations climate meeting. Democrats would like to complete work on
this massive bill by the end of October so that he can arrive armed
with a significant set of climate goals enacted into U.S. law.
The $150 billion Clean Electricity Payment Program, which would
reward utilities that add more clean energy capacity like wind and
solar power and fine those that do not, is one example of that,
Jayapal said. "Because it's a market-driven program there are real
arguments for keeping that to 10 years," she said.
Democrats are trying get Manchin's support for the electric program,
which he has long opposed, by boosting tax credits for coal and
natural gas power plants that capture and store carbon dioxide.
Both programs could support Biden's climate goals of decarbonizing
the U.S. power grid by 2035 and the wider economy by 2050.
Democrats plan to employ a special "budget reconciliation" tool to
spirit their legislation through Congress without support from
Republicans, who normally can use their minority status to block
bills.
(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; editing by Scott Malone, Jonathan
Oatis, Steve Orlofsky and Aurora Ellis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|