Five U.S. lawmakers accuse Amazon of possibly lying to Congress
following Reuters report
Send a link to a friend
[October 18, 2021] By
Steve Stecklow, Aditya Kalra and Jeffrey Dastin
LONDON (Reuters) - Five members of the U.S.
House Judiciary committee wrote to Amazon.com Inc's chief executive
Sunday, and accused the company's top executives, including founder Jeff
Bezos, of either misleading Congress or possibly lying to it about
Amazon's business practices.
The letter also states that the committee is considering "whether a
referral of this matter to the Department of Justice for criminal
investigation is appropriate."
Addressed to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, the letter followed a Reuters
investigation last week that showed that the company had conducted a
systematic campaign of copying products and rigging search results in
India to boost sales of its own brands - practices Amazon has denied
engaging in. Jassy, a longtime Amazon executive, succeeded Bezos in
July.
The letter states that "credible reporting" in the Reuters story and
recent articles in several other news outlets "directly contradicts the
sworn testimony and representations of Amazon's top executives –
including former CEO Jeffrey Bezos."
"At best, this reporting confirms that Amazon's representatives misled
the Committee. At worst, it demonstrates that they may have lied to
Congress in possible violation of federal criminal law," the letter
states. Reuters reviewed a copy of the letter.
In response, an Amazon spokesperson issued a statement that said:
"Amazon and its executives did not mislead the committee, and we have
denied and sought to correct the record on the inaccurate media articles
in question."
It added: "As we have previously stated, we have an internal policy,
which goes beyond that of any other retailer's policy that we're aware
of, that prohibits the use of individual seller data to develop Amazon
private label products. We investigate any allegations that this policy
may have been violated and take appropriate action."
Since 2019, the House Judiciary Committee has been investigating
competition in digital markets, including how Amazon uses proprietary
seller data from its platform, and whether the company unfairly favors
its own products.
In sworn testimony before the Judiciary Committee's antitrust
subcommittee last year, Bezos said the company prohibits its employees
from using data on individual sellers to benefit its own private-label
product lines. In another hearing in 2019, Nate Sutton, Amazon's
associate general counsel, testified that the company does not use such
data to create its own branded products or alter its search results to
benefit them.
Asked during the 2019 congressional hearing whether Amazon alters
algorithms to direct consumers to its own goods, Sutton replied: "The
algorithms are optimized to predict what customers want to buy
regardless of the seller."
The lawmakers' letter gives Jassy "a final opportunity" to provide
evidence to corroborate the company's prior testimony and statements. It
also notes that "it is criminally illegal to knowingly and willfully
make statements that are materially false, conceal a material fact, or
otherwise provide false documentation in response to a congressional
investigation."
[to top of second column] |
The Amazon logo is seen outside its JFK8 distribution center in
Staten Island, New York, U.S. November 25, 2020. REUTERS/Brendan
McDermid
It gives the CEO until Nov. 1 to provide a sworn response to clarify "how Amazon
uses non-public individual seller data to develop and market its own line of
products" and how Amazon's search rankings favor those products.
It also requests copies of all documents mentioned in the Oct. 13 Reuters
investigation.
"We strongly encourage you to make use of this opportunity to correct the record
and provide the Committee with sworn, truthful, and accurate responses to this
request as we consider whether a referral of this matter to the Department of
Justice for criminal investigation is appropriate," the letter states.
The Reuters probe was based on thousands of pages of internal Amazon documents –
including emails, strategy papers and business plans. They showed that, at least
in India, Amazon had a formal, clandestine policy of manipulating search results
to favor Amazon's own products, as well as copying other sellers' goods – and
that at least two senior company executives had reviewed it.
In response to the Reuters report, Amazon said, "We believe these claims are
factually incorrect and unsubstantiated." The company did not elaborate. The
company said the way it displays search results doesn't favor private-brand
products.
The lawmakers' letter also cites other recent stories in the Markup, the Wall
Street Journal and the Capitol Forum about Amazon's private-brand products and
use of seller data.
The letter's sharp wording ratchets up the rhetoric between Washington and Big
Tech. Companies including Amazon, Facebook Inc, Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc's
Google have been under growing scrutiny in Washington, Europe and other parts of
the world, fueled by concerns among regulators, lawmakers and consumer groups
that the firms have too much power and are engaging in unfair practices that
hurt other businesses.
The lawmakers' letter was signed by a bipartisan group, and included the
judiciary committee's chairman, Democrat Jerrold Nadler, and four members of the
antitrust subcommittee – its chair, Democrat David Cicilline, vice chair Pramila
Jayapal and Republicans Ken Buck and Matt Gaetz.
On Wednesday, following publication of the Reuters investigation, U.S.
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a prominent critic of Amazon, called for
breaking up the company. In India, a group representing millions of
brick-and-mortar retailers urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government to
take action against Amazon.
(Reporting by Steve Stecklow in London, Aditya Kalra in New Delhi and Jeffrey
Dastin in Palo Alto. Editing by Peter Hirschberg.)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |