Public speaks out on proposed congressional maps
Send a link to a friend
[October 21, 2021]
By PETER HANCOCK
Capitol News Illinois
phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – Members of the public got
their first chance to speak directly to state lawmakers Wednesday about
a proposed set of new congressional district maps, and most of those who
did were critical of the plan.
Democrats in the General Assembly released a proposed new map Friday
that divides Illinois into 17 congressional districts, one fewer than it
has had for the past 10 years because of the state’s population decline
since the 2010 census.
The General Assembly returned to Springfield on Tuesday for the start of
their annual fall veto session, and on Wednesday the House and Senate
Redistricting Committees held their first hearing since the proposal was
released.
Ryan Tolley, policy director for the reform advocacy group CHANGE
Illinois, noted that the proposal had been given a grade of “F” by the
Princeton Gerrymandering Project, a nonpartisan project at Princeton
University that seeks to eliminate partisan gerrymandering.
That was due mainly to its lack of partisan fairness and the fact that
the proposal includes a number of oddly shaped districts that are not
compact and which divide a large number of counties into multiple
districts.
“Splitting a county alone does not necessarily mean that a district is
gerrymandered,” Tolley said. “For instance, Cook County and DuPage
County have to be split due to their population sizes being larger than
what is allowed in congressional districts to meet equal population
standards. However, a district map with a higher number of split
counties does raise questions about what goals mapmakers set out to
achieve.”
A number of other people who spoke to both committees Wednesday
testified about their particular areas of the state, including residents
of southwest Chicago who are currently in the 3rd congressional
district.
Under the proposed map released last week, that district would be
greatly reshaped, stretching farther west, reaching into Will, Grundy
and LaSalle counties.
[to top of second column]
|
Republican Rep. Tim Butler, front, and Democratic
Rep. Lisa Hernandez listen to testimony Wednesday during a meeting
of the House Redistricting Committee. (Capitol News Illinois photo
by Peter Hancock)
“I've seen the proposed congressional map, and I'm
surprised at seeing the district I've called home for decades
replaced by something unrecognizable,” said Dale Fast, who lives in
the Beverly neighborhood of Chicago. “The southwest side of Chicago
is a diverse place. I've connected with my neighbors in Berwyn,
Cicero, Orland Park and many other suburbs around my home, because
we have common interests. The southwest side has consistently had
representation in Congress that hails from the same area, not the
rural parts of the state that share less in common with us.”
Others, such as Juan Calderon, a West Side resident and chief
operating officer at the Puerto Rican Cultural Center, urged
lawmakers to consider drafting a map that would have two
largely-Latino districts because the Latino population of Illinois
grew substantially over the past 10 years while the white and Black
populations both declined.
“We need an additional voice in Congress that will prioritize a
Latino collective agenda, both the Puerto Rico Self-Determination
Act currently in Congress and the Immigration Reform Act,” Calderon
said. “… Today, we have members in Congress that are not listening
to the Puerto Rican community, to the Latino constituents, because
of the lack of common interest.”
The proposed map released last week is considered a first draft and
will likely be changed before being voted on in either chamber.
Both chambers of the General Assembly adjourned Wednesday and
canceled their scheduled sessions Thursday, which means they won’t
vote on a new congressional map until next week at the earliest.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |