White House repeats no Taiwan policy change; experts see Biden gaffe
Send a link to a friend
[October 23, 2021]
By Jeff Mason and David Brunnstrom
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on
Friday reiterated that Joe Biden was not signaling a change in U.S.
policy toward Taiwan when he said the United States would come to the
island's aid if it was attacked by China, and analysts dismissed the
president's remark as a gaffe.
While Washington is required by law to provide Taiwan with the means to
defend itself, it has long followed a policy of "strategic ambiguity" on
whether it would intervene militarily to protect Taiwan in the event of
a Chinese attack.
Biden called that into question when he was asked at a CNN town hall in
Baltimore on Thursday night whether the United States would come to
Taiwan's defense if it was attacked by China and he replied: "Yes, we
have a commitment to do that."
Shortly after he spoke, a White House spokesperson said there was no
change in policy and analysts said it appeared the president misspoke.
Asked at a Friday news briefing whether it was Biden's intention to move
away from strategic ambiguity to make an unambiguous statement about how
the United States would respond to a Chinese attack on Taiwan, White
House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said: "Our policy has not changed. He was
not intending to convey a change in policy, nor has he made a decision
to change our policy."
Psaki added that, as stated in Brussels earlier on Friday by U.S.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, "nobody wants to see cross-strait issues
come to blows, certainly not President Biden, and there's no reason that
it should."
Psaki said the U.S. defense relationship with Taiwan was guided by the
long-established Taiwan Relations Act, under which Washington would
"continue assisting Taiwan in maintaining a sufficient self-defense
capability."
Another principle of the act was that Washington "would regard any
efforts to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means a
threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific and of grave
concern to the United States," she added.
Bonnie Glaser, a Taiwan expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United
States, called Biden's remark a "gaffe" and said it was "patently not
true" that Washington has a commitment to defend Taiwan.
[to top of second column]
|
President Joe Biden speaks during a town hall about his
infrastructure investment proposals with CNN's Anderson Cooper at
the Baltimore Center Stage Pearlstone Theater in Baltimore,
Maryland, U.S. October 21, 2021. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
"Some are suggesting a deliberate effort to send
unclear signals, but in my view, that makes no sense. A confused
U.S. policy weakens deterrence," she said, noting that Biden's Asia
policy czar, Kurt Campbell, had rejected "strategic clarity" over
Taiwan.
Another Taiwan expert, Douglas Paal, a former U.S. representative in
Taipei, said Biden was focused at the town hall on selling his
domestic economic agenda.
"Despite his reputation on foreign affairs, he can be occasionally
sloppy when distracted," Paal said. "The White House was right to
issue a speedy 'no-change-in-policy' correction, because that is
where policy is."
Biden's remark comes at an awkward time, while White House officials
are gearing up for a virtual meeting between him and Chinese leader
Xi Jinping, which, sources say, they hope will show the world
Washington can responsibly manage tense relations between the rival
superpowers.
China, which claims self-ruled Taiwan as its own, expressed its
displeasure, with a foreign ministry spokesman saying Beijing has no
room for concessions on its core interests.
China urges the United States "not to send the wrong signals to the
forces of Taiwan independence, to avoid seriously harming Sino-U.S.
ties and peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait," spokesman Wang
Wenbin said.
Taiwan's presidential office said its position remained the same,
which is that it will neither give in to pressure nor "rashly
advance" when it gets support.
(Reporting by Jeff Mason, Tim Ahmann and David Brunnstrom; Editing
by Chizu Nomiyama and Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|