Latest congressional maps draw more criticism
Send a link to a friend
[October 27, 2021]
By PETER HANCOCK
Capitol News Illinois
phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – The latest draft of a new
congressional district map for Illinois met with much of the same
criticism as the first draft during a House committee hearing Tuesday.
The latest proposal from legislative Democratic leaders was released
Saturday. It divides the state into 17 congressional districts, one
fewer than the state currently has due to its population loss since the
2010 U.S. Census.
“We need look no further than the concrete corridor that is the proposed
13th and the rural monoliths of the 12th and 15th to see that this is a
gerrymandered map,” Joel Funk, a resident of the Metro East area, said
during virtual testimony before the House Redistricting Committee.
Under the proposed map, a new 13th District would be formed along a
narrow strip of land stretching roughly 170 miles from East St. Louis to
Champaign.
The 12th District, in southern Illinois, would be a combination of two
existing districts because that is an area of the state that saw the
most dramatic population loss. It would pit incumbent Republican Reps.
Mike Bost and Mary Miller into a contest against each other.
The proposed new 15th District would be an oddly-shaped chunk of central
Illinois that wraps around the proposed 13th District, starting with a
portion of Collinsville in the Metro East area, stretching east to the
Indiana border, wrapping around the city of Champaign and stretching
west again to the Mississippi River, from an area just north of
Edwardsville northward to an area just south of the Quad Cities.
The proposal also calls for a new 16th District that would cover much of
southern and northern Illinois that would put incumbent Republicans
Reps. Darin LaHood and Adam Kinzinger into the same district.
“This is the kind of map that convinces more Americans that their vote
doesn't matter, and pushes to those that still bother to vote further
apart into tribes unable to communicate with each other,” Funk said.
William Sullivan, a resident of Chicago’s northwest side, also
criticized the maps, saying it divides neighborhoods in his area
unnecessarily.
“It would really have to be called the incumbent retention map because
the 5th and the 9th districts really have nothing in common,” he said.
“Neighborhoods are just strung together like spaghetti on the wall.”
[to top of second column]
|
Republican Rep. Tim Butler (front), of Springfield,
and Democratic Rep. Lisa Hernandez (rear left), of Cicero, listen to
testimony during a hearing of the House Redistricting Committee on
Tuesday at the Capitol in Springfield. (Capitol News Illinois photo
by Peter Hancock)
A number of people from the area that makes up the
3rd District, on Chicago’s southwest side, urged lawmakers to keep
the core of that district intact. Much of that area would be divided
into proposed new 4th and 6th districts.
An analysis of the latest proposal by the nonpartisan Princeton
Gerrymandering Project gave the proposal a grade of F on all three
categories that it measures – partisan fairness; competitiveness;
and geographic features. It said the maps would create a
“significant Democratic advantage,” that the proposed districts
would be “very uncompetitive relative to other maps that could have
been drawn,” and that it creates non-compact districts that include
“more county splits than typical.”
During the hearing, Republican Rep. Tom Demmer, of Dixon, asked
Democratic committee Chairwoman Lisa Hernandez, of Cicero, directly
whether the maps were drawn to increase Democrats’ partisan
advantage.
“I would say politics plays a part,” Hernandez said.
The Senate Redistricting Committee is tentatively scheduled to hold
a hearing on the maps Wednesday. But as of late Tuesday afternoon,
no notice of a hearing had been posted on the General Assembly’s
website.
Lawmakers have only two scheduled days remaining in the fall veto
session. Democratic leaders have said they intend to approve new
congressional maps before the veto session ends Thursday.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
|