Senate passes Parental Notice of Abortion Act repeal amid faith leader,
GOP opposition
Send a link to a friend
[October 27, 2021]
By JERRY NOWICKI
Capitol News Illinois
jnowicki@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Senate advanced
a measure to repeal the state’s Parental Notice of Abortion Act early
Tuesday evening amid staunch opposition from Republicans and religious
groups.
The repeal bill passed the Senate Executive Committee on a 9-6-1 vote
Tuesday shortly after 5 p.m., and passed the full Senate 32-22 shortly
after 8 p.m. Its future in the House was less certain as of Tuesday
night.
The current law, the Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995, was passed
decades ago but ultimately took effect only in 2013 after court
challenges. It does not require parental consent, only that a doctor’s
office notify a parent of the child’s planned abortion 48 hours prior to
the procedure.
Discussion on the repeal bill, an amendment to House Bill 370, centered
on whether a parent has the right to be informed by a medical
professional if their child was scheduled for an abortion or whether the
requirement needlessly puts at-risk youths in danger.
“This issue goes beyond the typical pro-life-versus-pro-choice debate,”
Republican Sen. Sue Rezin, of Morris, said in a news conference opposing
repeal last week. “We're way past just discussing our views on abortion.
We are literally now discussing if a parent has a right to know about
their child's pregnancy and abortion.”
Rezin and other GOP members of the committee questioned why a minor must
have parental consent to get their ears pierced or to receive a vaccine,
but would no longer be subject to parental notification of abortion
under the repeal.
Emily Werth, a staff attorney at ACLU of Illinois, responded that in
Illinois, a minor who is pregnant no longer has to receive parental
consent for any medical care. The pregnant minor could undergo a
caesarian section, receive a vaccine or get any other medical care
without parental notice or consent.
“And that is because the General Assembly has made the policy decision
that when a young person is pregnant, it is in their best interests and
all of our best interest that they have access to whatever medical care
they need, without delay, without being put in harm's way,” Werth said.
“Abortion is one kind of medical care that they may need when they are
pregnant. And it should be treated the same as any other kind of medical
care.”
There was also disagreement over whether the bill would help protect
human trafficking victims or put them in greater danger.
Representatives of the ACLU and human trafficking victim advocates have
argued that there has been no proven link that parental notification
serves as a deterrent for sexual traffickers or abusers.
Rezin cited a story by human trafficking survivor Brook Bello, who
previously testified that if her mother would have been notified when
she was forced as a youth by her traffickers to get abortions decades
ago, it may have helped free her from the situation.
“How would repealing this law not help human traffickers?” Rezin asked.
Sen. Elgie Sims, D-Chicago, the bill’s sponsor, responded that the bill
would direct a newly-created working group to look for policy solutions
for human trafficking and resources to fund them. The General Assembly
also recently created a human trafficking task force, Sims said.
Advocates for repeal also argued in the committee that, in some cases,
the parent or guardian is the person that is abusing or trafficking the
child, and notifying them would create a dangerous situation.
The GOP pointed at exceptions in the existing law that they said are
designed to protect victims.
The current law contains exceptions if the minor was a victim of
physical or sexual abuse or neglect by an adult family member, if the
minor is married or emancipated, or if the provider determines there is
a medical emergency, or if an adult family member waives the notice in
writing. A judge can also waive the requirement and has done so
approximately 575 times since the law took effect, Werth said.
[to top of second column]
|
Faith leaders, including Bishop Thomas Paprocki of
the Catholic Diocese in Springfield, on Tuesday argued at the state
Capitol against a bill that would repeal the Parental Notice of
Abortion Act of 1995. It passed a Senate committee Tuesday night.
(Capitol News Illinois photo by Jerry Nowicki)
Werth, who works with the ACLU of Illinois to assist
minors in the judicial bypass process, said while bypass works for
99.8 percent of the individuals who initiate it, the number does not
account for those who are unable to access it.
“The system is complicated and creates significant
logistical and emotional burdens for young people,” she said. “This
number only reflects the young people who actually manage to get to
court. There have been many who simply could not find a way to miss
school to attend court during business hours without their parents
being alerted.”
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, court hearings have taken place online,
making it even more difficult in some circumstances, she said. The
court process also makes victims relive their pain, she said.
Ultimately, the bill passed with only Democratic support. Democrats
Chris Belt, of Swansea, Thomas Cullerton, of Villa Park, Bill
Cunningham, of Chicago, Napoleon Harris, of Harvey, Michael
Hastings, of Frankfort, and Steve Landek, of Bridgeview, were all
recorded as “not voting” on the measure.
Democratic Sens. Rachelle Crowe, of Glen Carbon, Meg Loughran Cappel,
of Shorewood, and Patrick Joyce, of Essex, joined Republicans in
opposing the measure.
Because it did not receive a three-fifths majority, it cannot take
effect until June 1, 2022, due to a provision in the state
constitution that applies to bills passed after May 31.
Faith leaders, including Bishop Thomas Paprocki of the Catholic
Diocese in Springfield, earlier in the day argued the parental
notice law serves as a deterrent to abortion. At a Capitol news
conference, he characterized abortion as murder and said the
parental notice act was about parental rights and protecting the
mental health of the child.
“These laws exist because they protect children from making serious
life-changing decisions that they are not yet equipped to make,” he
said. “These laws exist to protect the rights of parents to fulfill
the duty that God has entrusted to them, and that no government can
take away.”
But advocates argued pregnant youths notify their parents willingly
in the vast majority of situations.
“And that's not going to change,” Werth said. “If we repeal the
parental notice of abortion act in Illinois, a majority of young
people will still choose to involve their parents, one or both
parents, in this decision because that is their chosen and trusted
support system.”
Sims also noted the bill would create the Youth Health and Safety
Advisory Working Group to “identify existing and needed resources
for pregnant and parenting youth, and youth seeking reproductive
health care.”
The unpaid working group would include four members appointed by
each the speaker of the House, Senate president and governor, at
least half of which are youth. Minority leaders would each appoint
two members, half of them youth. Each legislative leader would also
appoint a member from their chamber.
The working group would report to the General Assembly and governor
by July 1, 2023.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
|