Analysis: Afghanistan pullout spurs EU to revive rapid reaction force
Send a link to a friend
[September 01, 2021]
By Robin Emmott and John Chalmers
LJUBLJANA (Reuters) - The chaotic
withdrawal of Western forces from Afghanistan has shown that the
European Union needs to intervene militarily in a crisis without relying
on U.S. troops, senior EU officials say.
Two decades after EU leaders first agreed to set up a
50,000-60,000-strong force but failed to make it operational, EU states
are once again aiming to create a 5,000-strong "first entry force". They
want a deal on its design by March 2022.
But as EU defence ministers gather in the Slovenian capital on
Wednesday, the political impetus felt in Brussels, Paris and Berlin will
again evaporate unless the bloc can agree on quick decision-making
mechanism to deploy troops.
Two senior officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, voiced
frustration that the EU, an economic power, was not able to protect
Kabul airport for another three days beyond the Aug. 31 U.S. withdrawal
deadline to allow for more evacuations.
France, Germany and non-EU member Britain were among those wanting more
time to complete evacuations of their citizens and Afghans during a huge
airlift mounted by Western forces after the Taliban took control of the
country on Aug. 15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87058/870589affcd8fcedbff95fd9456f9f66f1499a36" alt=""
"We do not need another such geopolitical event to grasp that the EU
must strive for greater decision-making autonomy and greater capacity
for action in the world," EU Council President Charles Michel, who
chairs EU summits, said on Wednesday at the Bled Strategic Forum in
Slovenia.
NATO supports such views and the United States has urged Europeans to
invest in deployable troops, as long as European soldiers are not drawn
from its operations around the world.
BATTLEGROUP 'ROULETTE'
The sense of paralysis over Afghanistan in EU capitals was particularly
strong because the 6,000-strong U.S. military force used to secure Kabul
airport was roughly the same size as the EU battlegroups that the bloc
has had since 2007 but not used.
It was also a case of deja-vu. In the 1990s, EU governments proved
unable to act as a group in the Balkan wars and relied on U.S.-led NATO
to stop the bloodshed on their doorstep.
"We must strengthen Europe so that we never have to leave it up to the
Americans," Armin Laschet, Germany's conservative candidate to succeed
Angela Merkel as chancellor, said during a debate for this month's
federal election.
The EU's rotating battlegroups need the approval of all 27 EU states and
generally require an authorising resolution from the United Nations
Security Council. Previous efforts to deploy in Chad and Libya failed.
Disputes over funding are an issue.
One solution could be to break up the battlegroups into smaller units to
make them more flexible and more deployable, according to Niklas Novaky,
an EU defence specialist at the Wilfred Martens Centre in Brussels.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/152d0/152d0d8466fea674f788225d7be26900bb25746a" alt=""
Belgian army Special Forces are seen during the Black Blade military
exercise involving several European Union countries and organised by
the European Defence Agency at Florennes airbase, Belgium November
30, 2016. REUTERS/Yves Herman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff095/ff09588b8ae74fce9deab9e963f7fa7b7f1f0e72" alt=""
"Otherwise it's like playing roulette, because today
you need a battlegroup led by an EU state that has a specific
interest in the crisis of the day," Novaky said.
A senior EU official declined to comment on the status of the
battlegroups or who was the current lead country. No public
information has been made available for several years.
The EU will present a draft proposal of a "first entry force" in
November and wants a deal when France, the EU's leading military
power, takes over the six-month EU presidency from January.
SHIFTING FOCUS
Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy as U.S. president, as
well as Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, already
accelerated work in Brussels to build a common EU defence policy.
In late 2017, EU governments launched a pact to fund, develop and
deploy armed forces together, which one official said at the time
was "bad news for our enemies", even if joint military capabilities
will take years to be ready.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg in May welcomed the
inclusion of the United States into an EU-led project enabling
troops to move more quickly across Europe in the event of a conflict
with Russia.
But the focus on joint defence capability research has distracted
attention away from immediate "crisis management".
"The key problem is political will," Carlo Masala, an international
relations expert at the Bundeswehr university in Munich. "You can
have 50,000 or 60,000 excellently-trained men and women for these
kinds of operations. But if there is a lack of political will, it
won't work," he said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a44/04a44449917dc029ecafd95207b5aaa08039f0db" alt=""
(Additional reporting by Sabine Siebold, Writing by Robin Emmott;
Editing by Angus MacSwan)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |