Tree planting efforts aren’t replacing burned U.S. forests — not even
close
Send a link to a friend
[September 09, 2021]
By Adria Malcolm, Andrew Hay and Andrea Januta
DEER LAKE MESA, N.M. (Reuters) -
Experimental pine seedlings poke from the rocky New Mexico earth, the
only living evergreens on a hillside torched by one of the U.S. West’s
drought-driven wildfires.
These climate-smart sprouts about 30 miles (48 km) east of Taos are part
of a push to increase the dramatically lagging replanting of U.S.
forests after fires.
To condition trees for life in the Southwest, now suffering its worst
drought in 500 years, biologist Owen Burney takes the scraggly seedlings
to the point of death and back several times by starving them of water
in the nursery.
Burney wishes he had funding to mass produce the seedlings and expand
his tree nursery, the largest in the U.S. Southwest. With wildfires
growing to monstrous proportions https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-WILDFIRES/EXTREMES/qzjvqmmravx,
the nursery's output of 300,000 seedlings a year does not come close to
replacing torched trees.
“People get excited about reforestation, and they talk about it, but
talk is cheap without action,” says Burney, who heads New Mexico State
University’s forestry research center in Mora. “That’s what we’re trying
to create, the action of an effective reforestation pipeline.”
Reforestation supporters say planting trees helps fight climate change,
protects watersheds and creates jobs -- arguments that help generate
both global enthusiasm and U.S. bipartisan support. Lawmakers are
seeking extra federal funding for such efforts. Some public-private
partnerships committed to growing trees have been launched.
Still, evidence suggests replanting campaigns cannot keep up with
blazes.
Even with efforts in New Mexico, California and Oregon , there is
not enough seed collection or nursery capacity , according to nearly two
dozen land managers, biologists and conservationists Reuters spoke to
since June.
Federal replanting remains underfunded and poorly coordinated with the
private sector. State, tribal and private landholders struggle to find
sufficient seedlings, they said.
Wildfire is a natural part of a forest’s lifecycle, but climate-fueled
fires are so ferocious they incinerate entire stands together with
seeds that start regrowth.
That destruction also poses problems for the 180 million Americans who
rely on national forests to filter drinking water and the 2.5
million employed in forest industry jobs.
SYSTEM OVERWHELMED
Most U.S. wildfires burn on U.S. Forest Service land. The agency
replants around 6% of its land that needs replanting after wildfires.
“Our systems just haven’t kept up,” said David Lytle, the service’s
director of forest and rangeland management and vegetation ecology. “The
change to these larger, more severe wildfires has dramatically ramped up
our reforestation needs.”
Tree-planting fervor peaked in 2020 when the World Economic Forum
launched its One Trillion Trees initiative, or 1t.org, to grow, restore
and conserve 1 trillion trees globally. Former President Donald Trump
backed the plan. U.S. corporations and foundations pledged 50 billion
trees.
[to top of second column]
|
Tammy Parsons, nursery manager of the John T. Harrington Forestry
Research Center, lays out a plot at an experiment site on Deer Lake
Mesa in Cimarron, New Mexico, U.S., August 17, 2021. Picture taken
August 17, 2021. REUTERS/Adria Malcolm
Yet visit any Western national forest outside the
Pacific Northwest, which still has timber harvests that require
trees to be replanted, and there are no major planting efforts, says
Collin Haffey of The Nature Conservancy (TNC).
“It seems to be an afterthought of forest management,” said Haffey,
the group’s conservation coordinator in New Mexico.
According to Lytle, the problem is not tactics or expertise, but
funding. The U.S. Forest Service spends over half its budget
fighting and preventing fires. Last year, Congress granted it $7.4
billion in discretionary appropriations. Meanwhile, the amount
available for post-fire replanting has not grown since the 1980s.
The agency says it does not have enough money or resources to fully
reforest burn areas.
To boost replanting, lawmakers have included legislation -- called
the Repairing Existing Public Land by Adding Necessary Trees
(REPLANT) Act -- within the infrastructure bill Congress is
considering. It would help the service plant 1.2 billion trees on
4.1 million acres of national forests hit by fire, pests and disease
over the next 10 years by removing a $30 million annual funding cap
to roughly quadruple spending.
With limited public money, Wes Swaffar of 1t.org tries to channel
private funds into replanting. That can mean teaming companies
seeking zero net carbon emissions with projects that sequester
carbon.
“I’m so frustrated by the fact that I have to do this job in the
first place,” Swaffar said. “I have to play this interconnector role
between the public and private sectors, because neither one is able
to do it by themselves.”
A small success story is growing 85 miles (137 km) southwest of
Burney’s test site. With some money from the public-private Rio
Grande Water Fund, around 4,000 acres of burned-out forest near Los
Alamos are being replanted to mimic “tree islands” left after
moderate fires. Developed by the TNC, the project has 400
moisture-rich sites, some at higher, cooler elevations to help
seedlings survive future, higher temperatures.
“If we’re trying to do anything related to climate change, carbon
sequestration, then trees need to be in the ground,” said Burney,
who is seeking $40 million to create a New Mexico reforestation
center and help lift state annual seedling output to 5 million.
(Reporting by Adria Malcolm at Deer Lake Mesa, New Mexico, Andrea
Januta in New York and Andrew Hay in Taos, New Mexico; Editing by
Katy Daigle and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |