Op-Ed: The Nielsen ratings: A threat to
New York's entertainment industry
[The Center Square] Nicholas L. Waddy
Everyone remembers the
catastrophic housing crisis that hit this country like a tsunami back in
2008. What some people have forgotten is how our most respected
financial institutions, in the months and years leading up to the
crisis, were handing out the very highest ratings – AAA is the gold
standard – to the bonds that underlaid the subprime mortgage market. All
the experts agreed, in other words, that there was nothing to worry
about. Perversely, though, these experts' “credibility” was
grandfathered into the system. The data itself, which was flashing red
warning lights and setting off klaxon alarms all over the place, no
longer mattered – to them or to anyone else. |
The end result? The housing bubble burst, millions lost their
homes (and/or jobs), trillions in real estate value was wiped out, and only
recently have some markets fully recovered.
It's a cautionary tale about the dangers of flawed analysis and faulty
measurement, not to mention institutional complacency. And the bad news is that
lately we've been repeating some of the same mistakes.
This time it's the thriving New York state entertainment industry that's on the
hook. Roughly 60,000 jobs and more than $12 billion in wages are at stake in the
TV and film sectors alone in New York, the country's second biggest
entertainment powerhouse. New York's economy took a beating during the pandemic,
as everyone knows, so maintaining the robustness of our large and dynamic
television, film, and digital entertainment industry is paramount. To do so,
however, advertisers, producers, and giant media companies – many headquartered
right here in New York – need to know which shows are succeeding, and which are
failing. They need to know if and when their programming connects with the
American people.
To solve this problem, the Nielsen Company has for decades been studying
Americans' viewing habits, mostly in their own homes, using special equipment
that records what select families watch. It's a system that seemed to work great
back in the '60s and '70s, when everyone watched broadcast TV, because, in terms
of home entertainment, it was one of the only games in town. Since the 1980s,
though, technological and social changes have revolutionized the entertainment
industry, particularly television. A growing chorus of voices within the
industry has been criticizing Nielsen for sticking to its time-tested, but
arguably obsolete, methods of measuring “audience reach.”
During the pandemic, these rumblings of criticism became a
deafening roar. Nielsen not only failed to update adequately its methodology to
account for the incredibly diverse ways in which Americans now access television
programs – from streaming services to smartphones – but it also suspended its
home visitations, causing its estimates of viewership to become less reliable
than ever. Nielsen actually claimed that overall TV ratings went down at a time
when untold millions of Americans were under lockdown, despite the fact that
numerous trustworthy measures were indicating the exact opposite. Eventually
Nielsen itself had to apologize for the failures in its analysis and reporting.
These apologies did little to help the entertainment industry, though, which
lost hundreds of millions of dollars because of the negative implications that
Nielsen’s inaccurate ratings estimates had for TV advertising sales. For New
York, that meant job losses and show cancellations – on top of one of the worst
recessions in the state's history.
[to top of second column] |
The root of the problem is the fact that for
decades Nielsen was the only company accredited by the official
Media Rating Council and authorized to publish television ratings.
Its credibility, like that of the big banks and Wall Street firms
back in 2008, was grandfathered in. Even when Nielsen got it wrong,
most industry experts still deferred to its supposed wisdom.
At least they did until recently.
On Sept. 1, the Media Rating Council, under pressure from major
entertainment industry players, made the momentous decision to
suspend Nielsen's accreditation. During this “pause,” Nielsen will
have a chance to right the ship, while a host of new, dynamic, and
incredibly creative companies will have a golden opportunity to
compete in the ratings game on an even playing field for the first
time ever.
These developments are immensely promising. Prior
to the suspension, it sure looked as if we were headed for a
“Ratings Bubble,” i.e., a crisis of confidence in the current
ratings system so severe that it could have jeopardized the very
survival of some big entertainment companies. Thousands of New
Yorkers could have lost their jobs (many already have), because
advertisers, producers and media companies had foolishly placed all
their ratings eggs in the same Nielsen basket.
Kudos to the Media Rating Council, therefore, for doing what needed
to be done. It was high time they allowed for some novel approaches
in ratings measurement.
Let's hope there will be no backtracking. Never again should we go
back to the bad old days of “Nielsen or bust.”
At least for now, the New York entertainment industry can breathe a
sigh of relief.
Dr. Nicholas L. Waddy is an Associate Professor of
History at SUNY Alfred.
|