Google was addressing the General Court on the third day of a
week-long hearing as it tries to get judges to dismiss a record
4.3-billion-euro ($3.7 billion) EU antitrust fine and a European
Commission order to loosen its search engine grip on Android
devices.
The EU competition watchdog had taken issue with two kinds of
deals made with phone makers, one being payments for only
pre-installing Google Search on their devices known as revenue
sharing arrangements (RSAs) because these shut out rivals.
This was not the case and the payments were just to encourage
phone makers, which were already generating money from other
apps, to give Android a place, Google lawyer Assimakis Komninos
told the court.
"Google had to offer an offsetting revenue stream. An incentive
to convince them to open up and adopt the Android platform. At
the same time, the RSAs also helped them to keep prices down and
compete more successfully with Apple," he said.
"And obviously, Google was getting in return a promotional
opportunity, sole preinstallation, which allowed it to invest in
a free OS (operating system), a free app store and so on."
On top of that, the RSAs only covered 5% of the market, Komninos
said.
Commission lawyer Nicholas Khan rejected the claim.
"What concerned them was competitors gaining traction," he said
and the RDAs were "the pinnacle of Google's interlocking
practices".
A verdict is likely to come next year. The case is T-604/18
Google vs European Commission
($1 = 1.1714 euros)
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee;Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|