The new law, which bans abortions after about six weeks and empowers
private citizens to enforce it https://www.reuters.com/world/us/texas-abortion-ban-opens-up-wild-west-enforcement-critics-say-2021-09-02,
has the clinics "teeter-tottering between financial risk, legal risk
and staffing risk," said Marva Sadler, the facilities' director of
clinical services.
As the law is debated in courts - with a key hearing slated for
Friday - abortion rights advocates say its impact has been swift and
wide-ranging since it took effect on Sept. 1.
Abortion clinics are struggling to survive: The number of patients
getting abortions at Whole Woman's Health clinics dropped 70%,
Sadler said. Women are seeking other options, including traveling to
out-of-state clinics or obtaining abortion-inducing pills via mail.
Abortion rights advocates warn Texas will be a blueprint for other
Republican-led states if its law is upheld. They consider it a major
blow to Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1973 decision
that established the right to abortion access, which will itself be
tested https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-courts-rightward-lurch-put-roe-v-wade-brink-2021-09-03
by a Mississippi case the court will hear in December.
"Lawmakers from across the country were watching the Texas bill very
closely... and when the Supreme Court allowed
https://www.reuters.com/business/
healthcare-pharmaceuticals/texas-six-week-abortion-ban-takes-effect-2021-09-01
this unconstitutional ban to go into effect, they said, 'now's our
chance,'" said Elizabeth Nash, a state policy analyst at the
Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive rights research and policy
organization.
Texas' so-called "heartbeat" law bans abortion after cardiac
activity is detected in the embryo, usually around six weeks. That's
before most women know they are pregnant and before 85% to 90% of
all abortions are carried out, experts say.
The law makes no exception for cases of rape and incest. It lets
citizens enforce the ban, rewarding them at least $10,000 if they
successfully sue anyone who helped provide an abortion after cardiac
activity is detected.
Some of Texas' so-called "crisis pregnancy centers," Christian-based
facilities that encourage women to not have abortions, have seen a
rise in visits since the law took effect, with more women seeking
ultrasounds earlier in their pregnancies.
The Raffa pregnancy clinic in Greenville had a 166% increase in
ultrasounds in the first three weeks of September compared to the
same period last year, said the facility's executive director
Threesa Sadler, who supports the law.
Two clients whose scans revealed a fetal heartbeat were women she
thinks might have terminated their pregnancies had that still been
an option, she said.
"Beyond helping decrease abortion in Texas, I don't know if it was
an intended consequence that the law would also push more women to
(crisis) pregnancy centers, but I love that that's what's
happening," she said.
[to top of second column] |
On Friday, the U.S. Justice
Department will ask a federal judge in Austin to
temporarily block the law while its
constitutionality is challenged. Under Roe v.
Wade, states cannot ban abortion before the
fetus is viable outside the womb, which doctors
generally view as between 24 and 28 weeks.
Abortion rights advocates worry the law will have lasting damage
even if eventually overturned.
"We know that when these laws are passed, part of the strategy is to
close clinics while these bills sit in the courts awaiting
decisions," said Nikki Madsen, executive director of Abortion Care
Network, a national association that includes seven independent
abortion clinics in Texas.
Madsen said 23 of Texas'
42 surgical abortion clinics closed after the state passed a law in
2013 requiring clinic physicians to have admitting privileges at a
hospital within 30 miles. The U.S. Supreme Court overturned that law
in 2016, but today there are still only 19 clinics offering surgical
abortions in Texas.
ALTERNATE ABORTION ROUTES
Hundreds of women now are seeking abortions outside Texas,
lengthening wait times in nearby states such as Oklahoma and
Louisiana, according to evidence the Justice Department cited in its
lawsuit.
In court documents, an Oklahoma-based Planned Parenthood doctor said
Texas patients had traveled long distances to get treatment at his
clinic since Sept. 1. One woman drove six hours alone, one way,
because she feared any companion could get in trouble under the law.
Others are procuring abortion-inducing medication by mail.
KT Volkova, a graduate student in central Texas who uses the pronoun
"they," discovered they were pregnant a few days before the law's
effective date.
No appointments for surgical abortions near Volkova were available
before Sept. 1, and Volkova was already nearly six weeks pregnant.
Volkova, who volunteers with a group that provides financial
assistance to abortion seekers, opted against seeking funds to
travel out of state for the procedure and instead took an
abortion-inducing medication that came by mail.
"I would have preferred to have it in-clinic, with staff holding my
hand, but I had to go through the entire process in my apartment
alone," Volkova said.
Access to abortion-inducing medication will soon be further
restricted in Texas.
A state law taking effect on Dec. 2 will narrow the window for
medical abortions from 10 weeks to seven weeks after conception.
Providing women with abortion-inducing drugs by mail will be a
criminal offense under the law.
(Reporting by Julia Harte; Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Aurora
Ellis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content |