State Senate approves energy grid reliability task force
Send a link to a friend
[April 01, 2022]
By JERRY NOWICKI
Capitol News Illinois
jnowicki@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – The state Senate on Thursday
advanced a measure to create a task force to study electric grid
reliability in light of the 2021 passage of the energy regulatory
overhaul bill known as the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act.
A House committee, meanwhile, began preliminary conversations about
lifting the ban on new nuclear developments in Illinois.
The unpaid, 33-member task force outlined in Senate Bill 1104 would be
known as the Illinois Regional Generation Reliability Task Force. It
passed 32-15 in a bipartisan vote, although several Democrats voted
against the measure. It still needs approval in the House.
The task force would study the effect of state laws, including CEJA, on
energy prices as well as grid reliability. It would also study ways to
deploy new technologies and ways to “improve” the power supply mix,
among other tasks.
It wouldn’t have authority to create any new laws or regulations, but it
would report to the General Assembly by Feb. 1, 2023, and each year
thereafter.
Labor unions were among some of the prominent backers of the bill,
according to witness slips filed on the General Assembly website, while
the environmental group Illinois Sierra Club opposed the measure.
Task force makeup
The task force’s makeup was part of the reason the Sierra Club opposed
it, according to chapter director Jack Darin, who said the task force
wouldn’t be representative of the state.
The task force would be made up mostly of industry groups and lawmakers.
That includes three senators and representatives appointed by each of
the chambers’ majority leaders and two senators and representatives
appointed by the minority leaders. The governor would have an appointee
as well.
Labor unions would have two members, one appointed by the Senate
president, another by the House speaker.
The PJM regional transmission organization in northern Illinois and the
MISO regional transmission organization in the rest of the state would
each designate a member as well. Those are both federally-regulated
multi-state organizations that oversee grid reliability and energy
auctions for dozens of states. The independent market monitors of those
organizations would each have a representative on the board as well.
Several business interests also would have a seat at the table.
Six different power generation companies would have a spot on the board
– two appointed each by the Senate president and speaker and one each by
each chamber’s minority leaders.
Other groups receiving a seat on the task force include: statewide
retail, manufacturing, business and retiree associations; a
representative from a minority-owned geothermal group; and two
representatives from environmental law groups.
The directors or designees of the Illinois Power Agency, Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency and Illinois Commerce Commission would
be on the task force as well.
CEJA response
CEJA was the sprawling energy bill passed last fall that aimed to
decarbonize Illinois’ energy sector by 2050, requiring coal, gas and
other fossil fuel generating plants to go offline on a staggered
timeline.
Sen. Napoleon Harris, D-Harvey, carried the task force bill.
[to top of second column]
|
Sen. Napoleon Harris, D-Harvey, introduces a bill to
create a task force examining electric grid reliability. (Credit:
Blueroomstream.com)
“I've talked to the opposition about some of their concerns, and their
concerns was centered around potential rollbacks of CEJA,” he said. “I
assured them that's not the intention of this task force, but more so to
remain focused on testing the reliability of what we did, and to monitor
the grid reliability and to develop the tools to evaluate the impact of
those proposed policies.”
Darin, of the Sierra Club, noted he believed the task force function to
be duplicative of CEJA, while some of the findings contained in the bill
were contradictory of CEJA’s goals of making Illinois’ energy mix carbon
free.
Darin said the federally-regulated PJM and MISO grids could override
Illinois’ 2050 closure dates for fossil fuel plants if grid reliability
were threatened.
When CEJA was passed late last year, its Democratic backers noted it
specifically provides that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
Illinois Commerce Commission and Illinois Power Agency conduct a study
at five-year intervals to determine whether renewables and nuclear are
doing enough for grid sustainability.
If they’re not, Rep. Robyn Gabel, an Evanston Democrat who was one of
the lead negotiators in the House, said in September the agencies could
decide to leave some of the coal- or gas-fired plants online.
Sen. Mike Hastings, D-Frankfort, who was a chief co-sponsor on the CEJA
bill, echoed that sentiment in a September news conference.
“The first wave of plants to close would be 2030, and so 2025 we’ll
start the planning process in terms of grid reliability,” Hastings said
in a news conference following the bill’s passage. “And through that
we’ll determine, based on the planned closures, what's the baseload
generation going to be for the state of Illinois and we'll make an
assessment at that point whether or not we have to extend certain
timelines, or put other measures in place.”
Hastings supported the task force measure Thursday, noting in a floor
speech that it’s “a bipartisan issue to ensure that the lights do go
on.” The bill “should be a precursor” to look into new forms of energy,
he said.
Sen. Sue Rezin, a Republican from Morris who voted for CEJA, praised the
task force bill.
“We're not changing any of the negotiations from the last energy bill
that we agreed on, worked on for two years,” she said. “But this is a
task force to make sure that this state's energy portfolio has the
mechanism to create reliability.”
Nuclear ban
The House had its own discussion on energy reliability, with Rep. Mark
Walker, D-Arlington Heights, leading a discussion about lifting the
state’s 1987 cap on new nuclear power developments.
In a conversation with Capitol News Illinois, Walker said the cap was
put in place at a time when the dangers of carbon emissions were not as
clear as they are today. Nuclear energy does not emit carbon.
Having the option to consider new nuclear developments, whether they are
micro-reactors or large utility-scale plants, would be good to have as
the state seeks to be carbon free by 2050, he said.
The discussion at the committee level was on a subject matter basis,
meaning any decision to lift the cap would come at a future date.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news
service covering state government that is distributed to more than 400
newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press
Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |